I joined Pi Network in 2020. After years of trying, my KYC was fully passed in December 2024. By February 2025 I completed my First Migration. Then Second Migration rolls around in March 2026, and I open the app to find my status has been rolled back to Tentative Pass.

No explanation. No prompt to redo anything. Just a dead screen I open every single day hoping something will change.

I want to be clear about something. I am someone who actually reads instructions. I personally guided multiple referrals through the KYC process step by step. This is not user error. This is a system failure.

And while Pi Network keeps rolling out protocol upgrades (which is fine), the KYC app is sitting there in 2020 conditions. No revalidation button. No one-click liveness check. No pathway forward for people like me who were fully verified and then had that status pulled from under them without reason.

So my question to the team is this:

When are you actually going to upgrade the KYC app to include:

A revalidation option for people whose status changed without cause

A one-click liveness check feature

A permanent fix that stops reverting fully passed users back to Tentative Pass

The protocol upgrades are appreciated. But what good is any of it if your KYC system is locking out pioneers who have been here since the beginning?

I’ve been using LunarCrush for a while for sentiment tracking but the API costs are getting ridiculous for what you actually get out of it. I am literally constantly hitting limits and so am looking for something else, most threads are mentioning just LunarCrush.

Just want something that tracks social sentiment across the main platforms without costing an arm and a leg. Tried aixbt but looks expensive.
Doesn't need to be fancy, just useable/reliable at small scale (I’m more indie dev level)

Anyone have any suggestions? What are you using?

Here is mine: I bought 1000$ worth of PNUT (solana memecoin) back in early november 2024. Sold for 4x or so few days later. Then on november 11th 2024 Binance listed PNUT on spot trading out of nowhere like a week after I sold my entire bag. Had I just waited 1 more week I could have sold for 700-800k...

Now I am a broke 23yo, living paycheck to paycheck with a 85k/year job and a lot of debt...

Share your stories where you were actually really close to generational wealth:

Energy is getting the real moat in AI infrastructure...

- You can order more GPUs.

- You can't build cheap electricity capacity fast.

Lots of companies sitting on long-term power contracts are quietly in a strong position for the next 5 to 10 years — and most of them are currently priced as something else entirely.

Which ones are you watching?

There’s no shortage of content, but a lot of it feels biased, promotional, or overly technical.
New users often don’t know who to trust.

What’s the best educational crypto resource you’ve found that isn’t trying to sell something?

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.

Rules:

• All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
• Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
• Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
• Comments will be sorted by newest first.

Useful Links:

• Beginner Resources
• Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs ????
• MOONs Wiki Page
• r/CryptoCurrency Discord
• r/CryptoCurrencyMemes
• Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.)
• r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance.

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

• u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads.

I think browser based mining is a fairly new thing and I’m wondering what people think of it? I don’t want to plug any particular coin but I’ll point out browsercoin as a general example. For years it seems like there have been too many barriers preventing mass adoption but what if a browser based token automatically generates a wallet and you can mine at home or on a mobile device. Would this make crypto adoption easier for most people to enter and possibly stimulate use as a currency, whatever token that might be? I’m looking for meaningful discussion from folks who understand the tech better than me.

Curious: how are you feeling about crypto compared to a few years ago?

A. It’s the future, nothing changed
B. I’m not so sure
C. Yeah I’ve lost some enthusiasm
D. It’s probably another symptom of late stage capitalism and they’re gonna screw us
E. Other (explain)

I've been in crypto for a few years now and honestly most of my mistakes came from following influencers, Twitter narratives, and random YouTube predictions.
The biggest change for me was when I stopped looking for the next 100x coin and started focusing more on risk management, portfolio allocation and understanding market cycles.

I'm curious what resources have actually helped people become better investors over time. Not necessarily signal groups or trade calls, but communities, newsletters, research platforms, books, podcasts, etc.
What made the biggest difference for you?

I spent the last month building open benchmarks for crypto infrastructure. RPC latency, bridge fees, oracle deviation, stablecoin peg drift, L1 finality, Solana transaction landing rates. Everything is live, backed by Prometheus, the methodology is public, and the harness code is on GitHub.

Before I add more providers I want methodology review from people who have thought about this longer than I have.

Honestly the state of the field is rough. Every infrastructure benchmark I found falls into one of three buckets: marketing copy published by the provider being measured, a one off blog post with no live data and no methodology, or closed measurements you just have to trust. None of them are reproducible. None publish their sampling cadence, outlier handling, region split, or fetch mechanism. So I built one that does.

This is not a launch post. I want technical critique on how I am measuring, not feedback on the UI. Link is at the bottom. The methodology questions are why I am here.

Sampling cadence and aggregation

Each metric has its own scrape interval. RPC eth_call latency runs at 30s per provider per region. L1 finality wall clock is 10s polling for HTTP only chains, with a persistent WebSocket subscription for BNB and Avalanche so I can record when a block is first seen as latest and when the same block is first seen as finalized, down to the millisecond. Stablecoin peg is 5s on CEX REST tickers and 12s on Curve get_dy onchain. Aggregator head lag is 15s WebSocket event sampling.

Samples get bucketed per minute, then aggregated with quantile_over_time across the reporting window (24h or 7d). I publish p50, p90 and p99 separately. The leaderboard sorts on p50 by default because it is the most stable indicator of typical user experience, but the full distribution is queryable from the API and shown on each bench page.

For a single 24h window on a daily active metric I currently get roughly 100k to 500k data points per provider depending on cadence. I think that is enough to publish a leaderboard. Am I wrong? Where is the floor for "this comparison actually means something" in your experience?

Outlier handling, where I am least confident

For latency metrics I currently drop the top 1% per minute bucket before computing the per minute median. The daily p99 is then computed from those per minute medians, not from raw samples. This trims one off spikes (a single GC pause, a single network reroute) without hiding consistent tail behavior.

Three providers have already pushed back, in opposite directions. One says I am masking their real worst case (which they argue is still better than competitors with wider tails). Another says I should drop nothing and let the raw distribution speak. A third says I should drop more, top 5%, because they have a known rare failure mode they consider out of scope.

I do not have a principled answer yet. The tension is between representing typical experience honestly and letting one network event dominate the number. What do you do? Is there a paper or prior art you would point me to?

Multiregion

Three of the benches run in three regions: US East, EU West and Singapore. For those the leaderboard reports the median across regions, which hides regional advantages a provider may have.

A provider with a single US datacenter and no Singapore edge can look bad on the global number even if it is fast for its actual customer base. A provider that is strong only in EU looks mid tier when measured globally.

Right now I expose per region rankings as a filter on the bench page, but the shareable headline is the median across regions. Should this be configurable per provider? Should the headline default to the user's nearest region by geolocation? I have not seen anyone solve this cleanly.

Connection reuse

For eth_call latency I rebuild the HTTPS connection on every call to measure cold call latency. A few providers argue this is not representative, since in production their clients hold persistent connections and reuse them. They want warm call latency.

My reasoning is that cold call is the honest measurement when you do not know client behavior, and it captures TLS handshake overhead, which is a real cost. But warm call is closer to what a long lived application actually sees. Right now I publish cold call as the default and do not publish warm call at all. Right call? Should I publish both?

Why Prometheus

Two reasons. First, every number on the site is a literal quantile_over_time query. Anyone can hit the HTTP API, pull the raw sample series, and recompute the leaderboard with their own aggregation. Reproducibility is the whole point. Second, it makes adding providers cheap. The harness exposes /metrics with consistent labels, a new entrant opens a PR adding their RPC URL to the config, and the metric shows up automatically with no manual leaderboard edits.

The cost is that quantile_over_time is an approximation, not an exact percentile, so it deviates by roughly 1 to 2% from the true percentile on raw samples. For most users that is noise. For a provider sitting 0.5% behind the leader it can be the difference between rank 1 and rank 2. I disclose it, but I know some people consider it disqualifying.

Site:
https://openchainbench.com/

Github : https://github.com/OpenChainBench/OpenChainBench

It's so upsetting. So depressing to see the posts that the xrp community is putting out. I mean maybe they should spend their money on some dignity. They really need to get some because it doesn't look like they have any. It's such b******* what they say about xrp. Oh my God, the math doesn't add up. None of it does. If they have stable coins, why do they need xrp and just look at the amount of YouTubers spilling out of their neck? The same goat s*** that Jake Claver puts out or in cash official or some of those other stupid non-stop xrp channels God I've personally unsubscribed from every one of them. It makes me sick! I can't stand the xrp community anymore it's jus sad ????

Obviously related to price drop

Question. I've noticed that whenever new Bitcoin use cases are discussed, whether it's DeFi, lending, or other applications, there's always a group that strongly pushes back.

If these developments remain optional and don't change Bitcoin's core principles, why the resistance? Is it about security, simplicity, or something else?

Curious to hear different perspectives.

Hey guys,
im trying to get into some Crypto, im from Germany but I dont want to use my current Main Bank for that since I heard they often lock your accounts if you send Money to Brokers.

So I am looking for an Online Bank to use specifically to use for some regular online payments and sending money to my crypto broker, specifically Coinbase.

My question is what Bank inside EU/Germany you would recommend for this.
I took WISE and Revolut into consideration but dont know which one of the two is better for this, since WISE is more internationally supported to pay with in general additionally to sending money to my broker, but Revolut is EU licensed and all that.

But im not really all too informed about either which is why im asking here.

Hope anyone can help me out

I’m not sure if I’ve got the jist of crypto, maths isn’t my strongest suit. However I have invested in crypto since Covid, I literally have no idea what I’m doing, I usually invest when the market cap is down, I try to track the market (coin marketcap).
Recently I know the market is down massively due to a number of things, but I’m still investing a couple hundred every so often.
Thing is idk if I’m just being stupid, I try to check regularly and I’m basically in losses??

Can someone please give me some advice?

A payment is still pending on my blockchain acc. I'm trying to contact them to get support. On support center, it's asking me to log in. I'm already logged in. So I log in again, and the loop repeats.

So what should I do?

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.

Rules:

• All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
• Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
• Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
• Comments will be sorted by newest first.

Useful Links:

• Beginner Resources
• Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs ????
• MOONs Wiki Page
• r/CryptoCurrency Discord
• r/CryptoCurrencyMemes
• Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.)
• r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance.

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

• u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads.

Wrote this hastily. A bit middle of the road, so curious what others think. Not a trader and historically not the best predictor of what the corn is going to do.

Will sum responses with Claude.

—- Buying here is tricky.

$60K is the level to watch. If it doesn’t hold, prob a good buying opportunity in the $40s.

Right now AI is the only game in town, which will continue to soak up all the speculative oxygen for the foreseeable future. Probably tops at some point, hard to say when. SpacEX IPO is going to be interesting to watch, as will OpenAI and Anthropic whenever those happen.

There’s a chance newly created AI IPO wealth rotates back into BTC once AI valuations feel too rich for everyone and they want to diversify.

BUT…

As I said to you earlier, I never liked what Saylor is doing, and from what I gather he’s in a tough spot here (though I still don’t fully understand all the financial wizardry of it). Regardless, another cloud of uncertainty on the market. Then add quantum risk, and it’s hard for insto’s to allocate, which is what the market needs to go up.

Gut says everything’s in the shitter at least until fall. So if you were going to take a flyer, that would be the time period to do it.

But if there’s a big AI bubble pop, that probably takes everything down deeper, so that’s where your risk lies.

Hear me out on this. I was thinking about the ultimate end-game of hyperbitcoinization, and I stumbled into a bizarre paradox. If the Lightning Network becomes as fast, cheap, and seamless as Bitcoin maxis hope it will, could it actually end up undermining the very security of Bitcoin itself?

Think about the onboarding process. Right now, the goal is to get everyone onto Layer 2 because we all know the base layer can't scale to handle global, day-to-day commerce. But here is the catch: once a user is successfully onboarded into a Lightning channel, why would they ever leave?

If people move to Layer 2 and are just exchanging off-chain IOUs indefinitely, it creates a fatal economic flaw for the base layer:

The Fee Market Collapse: Bitcoin's long-term security budget relies entirely on transaction fees replacing the block subsidy. But if most daily transactions happen off-chain on Lightning, L1 transaction volume effectively dries up. Fewer L1 transactions means plummeting fee revenue for miners. If mining ceases to be profitable, the network's hashrate drops, making the entire foundational ledger vulnerable to 51% attacks.

The ultimate irony is that the better Lightning gets, the less economic incentive anyone has to interact with the base layer that secures it. By solving the scalability problem, they might accidentally be engineering a slow-motion vampire attack on Bitcoin's foundational security.

Change my mind.

Trail of Bits just released "trailmix," five new quantum circuits for the hardest step in Shor's algorithm: elliptic-curve point addition. They beat Google's and every prior published circuit on the efficiency frontier, including a new low-qubit record at around 1,066 logical qubits. Link: https://x.com/trailofbits/status/2062980523232805164

The attack comes down to running that point-addition step billions of times, so a cheaper step means a smaller, faster quantum computer can do the job. The curve being optimized, secp256k1, secures Bitcoin, Ethereum, and most coins, so every improvement is another tick toward "Q-Day," the day a large enough quantum computer exists. No machine can do it today; the point is how fast the gap is closing.

Shor's exploits a one-way function. Your public key is derived from your private key in a way that is easy forward and effectively irreversible on a classical computer, but Shor's reverses it on a quantum computer by turning the secret into a hidden repeating pattern that interference surfaces all at once. Ordinary arithmetic then recovers the private key.

Breaking ECDSA is not exotic. It is the textbook use case quantum computers were designed for, and the algorithm has been public for over thirty years. No further breakthrough is required. Once a large enough fault-tolerant, general-purpose quantum computer exists, breaking crypto is just running a known program on it: no new physics, no special crypto-breaking hardware, nothing left to invent. What is left is building the hardware and shrinking the circuit. That second part is already a public, ongoing effort: the open challenge at ecdsa.fail (https://www.ecdsa.fail) is a live leaderboard where contributors, including AI agents, compete to make the point-addition circuit leaner, and submissions have already pushed below Google's numbers. Once standard quantum hardware crosses the size threshold, configuring a circuit to break the key is the easy part; that piece is already well understood and getting leaner by the week.

The risk to holders is direct. The moment a public key is exposed on-chain, by spending or reusing an address, it can be targeted, and coins already sitting behind an exposed key cannot be retroactively protected. It is the crypto version of "harvest now, crack later."

The fix is quantum-safe signatures, hash-based or lattice-based schemes that Shor's has no shortcut against. NIST has already standardized them.

One chain was built this way from the start. QRL has been quantum-safe since its 2018 genesis, using hash-based signatures Shor's cannot break. Its upcoming upgrade, QRL 2.0, extends that as a proof-of-stake, energy-efficient, EVM-compatible network where existing Solidity contracts port over with minimal changes. It signs with ML-DSA-87, NIST's highest post-quantum security tier (Level 5), and it is crypto-agile, able to adopt new post-quantum algorithms without a contentious fork; it has already moved its entire signature stack up to a stronger level in about two weeks. Testnet V2 has been live since March 2026, Halborn audited the cryptography library with no vulnerabilities found, and Trail of Bits is auditing the full protocol, with mainnet targeted for 2026 after the remaining audits. Its throughput benchmarks land in Ethereum's range even though post-quantum signatures run tens of times larger than ECDSA's.

I'm a Dubai resident, here stablecoins are very well adopted, I had a deal which I got USDT, i'm looking to swap it for Bitcoin but the problematic is I got advised not to use Binance/any CEX at any cost as the purpose of Crypto, i heard a ton of horror stories.

Is there currently and concretly a way to convert USDT to Bitcoin?

Rough week across the board. BTC ~51% off its Oct ’25 high, ETH at 2-year lows, SOL at its lowest since Dec 2023, F&G buried in fear, and ~$1.7B in leverage wiped in a single 24h stretch.

Instead of the “is the bull market over” doom takes, I tried to separate what broke from what just sold off. Going through the drivers, almost none of them are crypto-native:

• Record ETF redemptions — US spot BTC ETFs logged their biggest weekly outflow ever (\~$3.4B); ETH ETFs are on their longest net-outflow streak on record. Direct bid leaving the market. • Macro risk-off — sticky inflation, stronger dollar, Fed “higher for longer.” Capital rotating to cash/bonds/gold. Every risk asset is getting sold, not just crypto. • Leverage flush — mostly mechanical, longs cascading into liquidation. Painful, but it resets froth. • Cycle psychology — we’re squarely in the part of the 4-year window where sentiment historically sours. 

What’s not on the list: no protocol failure, no exchange blowup, no broken networks. Chains processing, DeFi functioning, dev activity intact.

The one genuinely interesting divergence I can’t stop looking at: while BTC and ETH ETFs hemorrhaged billions, Solana spot ETFs just posted their best month of 2026 (~$15.6M net inflows last week, total SOL ETF assets crossing $1B). Smart money rotating into one name during peak fear is at least worth a conversation.

Not calling a bottom — ETH prediction markets are pricing 70%+ odds of a deeper leg down, and BTC’s still in a confirmed downtrend. Just that the cause here reads as liquidity + sentiment, not fundamentals.

Where’s everyone landing — capitulation flush, or the start of something worse? And is the SOL flow divergence signal or noise?

I’m holding shit bags that keeps getting delisted. Plus I’m down from £18k in 2024 with a total of £5k invested to £1.8k

The head is in the water when I sit on the toilet so I figured, why not.

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.

Rules:

• All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
• Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
• Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
• Comments will be sorted by newest first.

Useful Links:

• Beginner Resources
• Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs ????
• MOONs Wiki Page
• r/CryptoCurrency Discord
• r/CryptoCurrencyMemes
• Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.)
• r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance.

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

• u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads.

When people talk about this industry they usually say "crypto." When they invest in the traditional equities market they will usually tell you specifically which companies. The VAST majority of trading here is automated, and based off of BTC. I'm a firm believer that this market dump was caused (in addition to all of the typical external risk-related things) people becoming spooked about bitcoin. But since the market still behaves as a homogeneous lump, all projects dive automatically when investors (speculators) dive from bitcoin.

The bitcoin narratives have evaporated one by one. No one uses it as a currency. It's not digital gold. Hard cap is not guaranteed. It's not unbreakable. It's not a hedge against inflation. It seems clear that, despite whatever tomorrow's new narrative, it doesn't have a lot of practical use. This community has known that, but the TV-viewing public is now realizing it.

Meanwhile ETH has been attracting positive attention and development. The biggest criticisms so far (other than 'how has it changed my life day-to-day') have been that the price hasn't reflected the progress made. But the progress is undeniable. Projects ARE happening at some of the largest financial institutions in the world. We've yet to see whether these will bear fruit or not. However, the "projects" related to bitcoin were ETFs, and part of this dump might be related to the fact that the ETF fantasy has proven to mostly fall flat.

All this to say, that I believe ETH is being traded automatically based on BTC price movement. Market is dumping bitcoin, therefore market-wide is dumping because of the automated trading. If you're a believer in the future of ETH, this is a pretty great moment to be buying. This would be a great moment to buy any asset that sees a dramatic drop in price because of something unrelated to its investment thesis.

I am trying to undersand the Zcash bug that was recently discovered. Does anyone know if there is certainty about whether it was exploited or not? Would there be any evidence of an exploit if someone had used it to mint a bunch of ZEC?
https://x.com/CryptoTubeYT/status/2062502670909530409

Sarcasm aside, I’ve been in crypto since 2016 and am blown away with the fact that we never learn anything from history. In every single cycle, no exception, we get to the “crypto is dead” phase when everyone is losing their minds - ESPECIALLY those deep in crypto, which makes no sense. If you’d take literally ten minutes of your time to study previous cycles, you’d see that it always repeats itself. Yes we’re in a bear market, DCA what you can and forget about it for fucks sake. Thank me later.

Hi guys, from this insane dip i've sold some stock assets and bought ETH which I plan to hold for at least 3 years without touching it, I know we can stake it and earn passive interests which interests me currently.

Problem is, i've digged to make a node and it seems like there's an unstake delay, isn't there a way to stake it without delay during unstaking? Thanks

Just sold all my physical gold to buy Bitcoin. It's not much but if this plays out really well I will be living comfortably for a couple of decades.

This is absolutely insane and just continues to remind me of the COVID dip in March 2020.

ETH is no longer #2, falling to #3 now to Tether.

Many of the big alts are dropping BELOW their low ranges of the 2022/2023 bear market, lower than even where they were after the collapse of FTX.

Crazy to see this all playing out. I am predominantly BTC, but also have had positions in ETH an ADA for a while now.

I've been loading up aggressively on BTC this year in the 60k range, but the insane volatility on the alts has made me a bit more conservative with my moves on them. This will eventually find some sort of floor of support where it stabilizes, I don't know exactly where or when this will happen, so plan is to focus more on accumulating BTC for now.

Crazy times.

This guy called it, he even predicted Saylor's sell out around this time. Read his comments.

It’s this simple.

Decide if you believe in the future of any investment.
Hopefully you do this before you enter.

Seems like not everyone does this.

So do it now. Decide if you see a future. Make up your mind. What other’s say can’t change it. They can share ideas that you need to assess and research, but don’t just listen to the noise. You will get lost in other people’s confusion and doubt.

I believe a few specific cryptocurrencies will be much higher someday. I do not know or care when. I also imagined price going down by 75%. I decided I would buy.

I decided to buy back in below ——. After selling with over 3x profit, I bought back in at ——, add, and dca no matter what price does.

Tank it. I want more cheaper.

I can sit on paper losses until Ia few minutes before I die. I would sell then and give the cash to someone I love or give them the asset.

When I bought in, I saw the money as gone. I also bought in with 100% profit.

If you bought higher, lower prices should seem like a discount or a sale.

I like lower prices so I buy more when I can.

Buy into weakness if you believe in the future of any investment.

If you are questioning the future, do more and extensive research. Look into the sources of your doubts.

If you still lack unshakable conviction, set a stop loss and stick to it or just sell and preserve capital.

It’s better to do all of this before you enter any investment, not after or when price is going down.

Im down like 65% now and my portfolio exists off 30 percent SOL%, 23% LINK, 22% ETH only 16% BTC and 8 percent in BONK (only down 30%). Im wondering if its time to cut some losses and move it all into BTC sinds a long bear is probably ahead and altcoins are to unpredictable. BTC is at a good price to do this but these alts have bled a lot more relative to BTC. Im really doubting what to do here because doing this will make recovery to break even way harder but I plan to lump sum at 45000 to almost double portfolio. BTC price needed would go down from ~$170000 to ~117000. Would you stay in the alts at this point or convert I have done my personal research but am at a loss here

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.

Rules:

• All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
• Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
• Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
• Comments will be sorted by newest first.

Useful Links:

• Beginner Resources
• Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs ????
• MOONs Wiki Page
• r/CryptoCurrency Discord
• r/CryptoCurrencyMemes
• Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.)
• r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance.

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

• u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads.

Feb 3rd 2021 - Eth, $1,550
Jun 12th 2022 - Eth $1,550
Jan 15th 2023 - Eth $1,550
Sep 12th 2023 - ETH $1,550
April 7th 2025 - ETH $1,550
June 5th 2026 - ETH $1,550

Congrats to all ETH holders.

We have to make sure this message gets out there for those who need it. US Only of course, other countries, good luck. Those with crypto stand with you.

I've been in this position many times before, when everything felt dead, sentiment was terrible, and it seemed like Crypto was headed to zero.

My advice is simple: stick with Bitcoin.

I don't hold a huge amount, and I've sold some Bitcoin when I genuinely needed the money, for example, to cover medical expenses and my sister's tuition fees. But I never sold because of fear.

Over the years, I've learned that constantly jumping from one crypto project to another is usually a losing game. Most people don't lose money because they bought Bitcoin, they lose money because they chase the next big thing.

Bitcoin forces discipline. There are no promises of revolutionary new features every few months, no endless stream of tokens to speculate on, and fewer temptations to gamble on hype. You simply buy, hold, and focus on the long term.

Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies may succeed, but they also introduce additional risks. The more projects you follow, the more opportunities there are to make emotional decisions, take unnecessary risks, or fall victim to hacks, scams, and poor investments.

From a psychological perspective, many investors place greater value on Bitcoin's Proof-of-Work system because it requires real-world energy and resources to secure the network. Whether that ultimately matters is up for debate, but it is one reason Bitcoin continues to stand apart.

If you look at the history of the crypto market, Bitcoin has remained the dominant asset through multiple booms and crashes. Many predictions have been made about another cryptocurrency overtaking it, but so far Bitcoin has remained at the top.

At the end of the day, the choice is yours. But if you're going to participate in crypto, my view is that keeping things simple and focusing on Bitcoin gives you the best chance of staying disciplined and avoiding costly mistakes.

And if you do buy Bitcoin, learn how to take custody of it yourself. A hardware wallet gives you direct ownership of your coins instead of relying entirely on a third party.

Let me put it this way, if you give up on Bitcoin too early, you might miss the long-term upside. But if you stay through the cycles, there’s a real chance it can make a meaningful difference over time. The choice is yours.

Wouldn’t it be good for retail for Saylor to be forced to liquidate his leveraged positions? If he misses a payment the penalties will be onerous. He’s not even bothering to raise the interest of his STRC but if he does that will just accelerate the liquidation.

The whole thing could be over in a few weeks with retail getting some cheap coins and these “bitcoin treasuries”
will have been shaken to the benefit of long term accumulators. Just my two cents

So I bought Cardano way back in 2017 and of course haven‘t sold any of it yet, like an idiot.

Lately, or for like a few years now, I have mostly seen bad news and articles about it. And with the latest news it seems like this time it really goes to shit. Is anyone here in the same boat and still has some hope left?

What are the main points why people started to hate it in the first place?

Saw a lot of panic posts today and just wanted to drop a quick note.

Yeah, BTC is down ~45% from its October highs. Market cap is sitting around $2.2T. ETH is struggling, alts are bleeding. It looks rough. I get it.

But if you've been here since 2018 or 2021, you know this feeling. This exact feeling. The "is it over?" posts, the doom threads, the guys saying crypto is dead. We've seen this movie before and somehow it keeps surprising people every time.

I remember back in 2022 I had a decent chunk sitting on Nexo earning yield, watching it drop week after week. Logged into Kraken one morning, saw my portfolio was down like 60% from where I entered, and genuinely considered just pulling everything out. Glad I didn't. That moment of pure panic was almost exactly the bottom.

For the people who just got in, this is genuinely stressful and I'm not going to pretend otherwise. Watching your portfolio drop hurts. That's real. But this is also just how this market works. It always has, probably always will.

Nobody knows exactly where the bottom is. Not me, not the analysts, not the guy on Twitter with 400k followers. What I do know is that the people who panic sold in 2022 weren't smiling in 2023. Don't make permanent decisions based on temporary fear.

Stay safe out there, don't invest more than you can afford to lose, and try to zoom out a little. ????

I don't get it at all.

ZEC has a 20% tax on all blocks that goes to the devs.

It's not fungible.

Someone may have minted themselves a trillion coins and there's no way to know.

Nobody uses it.

Meanwhile, XMR:

No founder/dev tax. No real founder either.

Fully fungible.

Widely used as a currency.

Closest thing to Bitcoin in 2009-2016 and the original vision of Bitcoin.

I feel like most people are overpaying on ETH transactions a lot. Plus if everybody overpays that just makes the fee estimator suggest higher fees.

Yes I know, not paying enough and getting your tx stuck is super annoying but is it really worth losing 45 cents on every tx for NO REASON?

Honestly, there must be better software wallets then Metamask by now? I am using a trezor + metamask but I am so tired of using metamask. Any good alternatives that are trusted and open source?

A bug was discovered that had been dormant for years and could in theory allow someone to mint ZEC in the shielded pool

It was found by a white hat and immediately patched with no evidence the exploit was ever materialized

My take: unlikely someone exploited it as they would’ve rugged $1b of dollars of liquidity already

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.

Rules:

• All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
• Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
• Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
• Comments will be sorted by newest first.

Useful Links:

• Beginner Resources
• Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs ????
• MOONs Wiki Page
• r/CryptoCurrency Discord
• r/CryptoCurrencyMemes
• Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.)
• r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance.

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

• u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads.

I used to trade sandbox land on opensea back when virtual plots were going for absurd amounts. at the time it felt like something real was forming. communities, events, brands buying in. felt inevitable.

then it just… quietly stopped being a thing anyone talked about.

SAND is down like 95%+ from its peak. MANA is basically forgotten. GALA pivoted so many times I lost count. and the land market on opensea that used to have real volume just looks like a graveyard now.

what I keep wondering is whether any project in that space actually kept their head down and built through all of it, or whether the playbook was the same everywhere, wait for attention to leave, quietly add AI to the whitepaper, and hope the next bull cycle brings new people who don’t remember 2021.

Hi guys, as a Dubai resident i invest in real estate and sold a property for USDT on ethereum chain, this is the first time I'm having cryptos, i love this universe.

I'm looking to hold only Bitcoin for long term basis but i don't want to use a KYC option, I heard about strike but it had kyc actually, what are options around?

Currently unrealized; soon to be realized...

I'm looking to bridge directly my assets into my hyperliquid account, is there a simple way to do that? I used to be annoyed with the official arbitrum bridge that takes 1 week to arrive but i have a position and i need to get there as soon as possible.

Thank you for advices, please leave a suggestion in comments

I’ve now stopped putting money into index funds (like S&P500) for my traditional retirement and gone balls deep into Bitcoin instead.

The last time I did something like this was during the Luna collapse in 2022. Then FTX happened right after, and yeah, that one hurt.

I'm in a good position to keep buying. I have a job that allows me to buy every week. No debt. No kids. No lavish lifestyle. Just a simple wife and a simple life.

I have no idea what the next “FTX collapse” will be or what it’ll look like. But I do think there’s light at the end of the tunnel, especially as we get closer to the halving.

My avg. price atm is at $32k

Woke up to BTC sitting around $65,600 and my portfolio looking like it got hit by a bus. Meanwhile every AI stock on the planet is ripping to new highs. Cool.

What's getting to me isn't the price action itself. It's who's selling. Saylor's company dumped about 32 BTC, first sale since late 2022. Cuban apparently offloaded most of his stack after BTC did nothing during the Middle East mess. Kiyosaki, the guy who wouldn't shut up about bitcoin for years, is now warning people to be careful with crypto.

These aren't random retail panic sellers. These are the faces on the "buy and hold forever" billboards.

Then you've got Mt. Gox moving roughly $739 million to a fresh wallet, spot ETF outflows hitting records, and prediction markets already pricing in $50K scenarios for this year.

I'm not selling but I'm also not pretending this doesn't look bad. The money is rotating into AI and we're just sitting here watching it leave.

I kept seeing the MoneyLine pitched as a premium signal tool, so out of curiosity I spent a day working out what it actually is under the hood. Sharing because the method to figure this out applies to basically every "one line tells you when to buy and sell" product, not just this one.

What gave it away
The MoneyLine has exactly two states: flip up and flip down. Its scanner shows one thing per coin, bullish or bearish, plus how long since it flipped. That is the exact fingerprint of a single trailing trend filter and the most common one that behaves precisely like that is a SuperTrend.

What a SuperTrend is
A SuperTrend is a volatility band (ATR based) that trails price and flips when price closes through it. Green in an uptrend, red in a downtrend, one flip up, one flip down. It's built into TradingView and there are dozens of free public versions. You can add it to any chart in about ten seconds, no subscription, no account.

If you want to check a paid signal line yourself, just add a free SuperTrend, start near the standard settings (ATR length around 10, multiplier around 3), and nudge the multiplier until the flips line up with the paid one. If they match, you're looking at the same tool with a different coat of paint. This works for a surprising number of "premium" trend indicators.

Is Ivan a scammer?
Worth being fair. I'm not calling anyone a scammer. The only thing I'd push back on is the economics, as you'd be paying a monthly sub for a trend line you can add to any chart for free.

The part that actually matters for your trading
Here's the uncomfortable bit for anyone selling you the line. A bare trend flip, traded on its own, is not an edge. I backtested a plain SuperTrend flip out of sample and it was a net loser by itself (profit factor well under 1, roughly a coin flip minus fees). Don't take my number for it, the point is it's trivial to test on your own data. What makes trend systems work is the gating and risk around the line (regime filter, sizing, exits), not the line itself. So when a product sells you "the line" as the product, you're paying for the cheapest, least important part.

TLDR;
Before paying for any indicator, two questions: (1) What does this do that a free public indicator doesn't? (2) Can I see it tested with the losing periods included, not just the winning screenshots? If the answer to 1 is "nothing" and 2 is "no," you have your answer.

Curious if anyone here has pulled apart other paid crypto tools and found them to be repackaged free indicators. And if you use TradingView, try matching the MoneyLine flips to a plain SuperTrend on your own charts and tell me if they line up.

I started accumulating small bags of solana each month been 2 months but i can t resist adding more when it crashes like today bought at 72 is it bad should i stick to my plan and stop investing too much into it since these solana will not be sold before 2028(next cycle)

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.

Rules:

• All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
• Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
• Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
• Comments will be sorted by newest first.

Useful Links:

• Beginner Resources
• Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs ????
• MOONs Wiki Page
• r/CryptoCurrency Discord
• r/CryptoCurrencyMemes
• Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.)
• r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance.

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

• u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads.

So i currently own USDT under the BNB network. I want to swap it to USD then deposit it to my bank account. How can i do this?

Do i need to first swap the usdt into bnb? Then from there send it to my coinbase and sell?

Ive seen a couple of videos saying to use coinbase and sell the crypto into usd.

My holdings are on Trust Wallet.

Thanks for the help!

These are my observation driven thoughts on why Bitcoin actually pumped to $124k+, why it’s dipping now, and why the next bull run will look completely different.

Searched my reddit comments/posts related to ETF for the past one year and majority were cautionary tale and many in this space were just like me; warning of the negatives that might come with ETF/our hunger for institutional adoption. Hence my surprise seeing a lot of people blaming the recent market crash on MicroStrategy/Michael Saylor selling 32 BTC. Let’s be real: Saylor selling 32 Bitcoin is pocket change to the market. It’s literal noise.

If you want to know what’s actually moving the needle, you have to follow the institutional money.

1. The $124k+ Peak: Powered by ETFs ????.

Bitcoin didn't smash past $124k because of retail hype or single-whale wallets. It was entirely driven by the massive, relentless inflows from Spot Bitcoin ETFs. Wall Street opened the floodgates, pumping billions of dollars of net-new capital into the market day after day. That kind of institutional buying pressure creates a supply shock, and that's what launched us into the six figures.

2. The Correction: The Outflow Effect ????.

So, why the recent crash? It’s the flip side of the same coin. The moment macroeconomic jitters hit, those same ETFs started seeing massive, consecutive days of net outflows. When hundreds of millions of dollars are being pulled back out of the fund products daily, the market loses its primary engine.

Blaming a tiny fractional sale by a modern-day maxi like Saylor ignores the massive systemic selling pressure coming from shifting institutional portfolios.

3. The Next Surge: The "Sellers at the Top" Problem ????️.

Here is my hot take for the next leg up: The next Bitcoin price surge will see way more sellers at the top than buyers.

Why? Because a massive chunk of supply is now held by traditional finance investors and institutions who operate on strict profit-taking algorithms and risk-management models. Unlike the "HODL at all costs" crypto natives of the past, these new players will ruthlessly lock in gains as soon as BTC hits their target.

The days of a retail-driven infinite squeeze are changing. The next peak is going to face a massive wall of institutional sell orders.

I think we have become too dependent on ETF, and for the 400th+ time, this might be the end of btc as we knew it.

I see not much development on the discussion on BIP360&361 lately. This worries me a lot. Both Google & Microsoft anounced just recently that 2029 will be the year to be prepared for quantum threat by ready to use quantum computers. Not to mention the roadmap of the smaller pure plays. I just cannot believe they are totally wrong, and even if this is coming later I want to have BTC secured (not worried about my coins - they are safe - but the integrity of the project).

A lot of people will cry FUD, but what are the Real Arguments? What do you think about that?

bitcoin crashes below 68k and liquidates 1.2 billion dollars in positions today and somehow zcash is up 13% on the same candle. that’s not a correlation that’s an inverse and nobody in the comments of any post i’ve seen today is talking about it

the on-chain stuff makes it weirder. shielded supply went from 8% of total zec to 30% in about two years and the growth is leading price not following it which matters because every previous zec rally showed the opposite pattern. price pumped first, shielded supply stayed flat, rally faded. this time the actual usage metric moved first and multicoin disclosed they’ve been accumulating since february calling it the cleanest expression of a specific thesis they didn’t fully spell out

franklin templeton’s CEO said something on stage this week that i keep thinking about. she said wall street fears blockchain because it threatens a huge number of their existing business models. coming from a 1.5 trillion dollar asset manager that’s been quietly building onchain infrastructure for two years that’s not a neutral observation

and then yesterday, completely quietly, anomapay just launched on ethereum mainnet. no hype. no influencer campaign. 15 second zk transactions, payment links you send over telegram, fees paid in whatever token you’re already holding, works with wallets people already have. the one app that makes stablecoin transfers actually private dropped on june second while everyone was watching bitcoin liquidation charts

stablecoins are processing double visa’s annual volume on fully public ledgers right now. every transaction permanently visible to anyone with a browser. someone at multicoin figured something out in february. franklin templeton is warning about it on stage. and the infrastructure to fix it just went live yesterday

From article.

The U.S. Treasury Department on Tuesday sanctioned Nobitex, Iran's largest crypto exchange, along with three other trading platforms based in the country as part of the Trump administration's "Economic Fury" campaign against Tehran's financial networks.

The Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control, better known as OFAC, said Nobitex "processed over 50 percent of all Iranian digital asset inflows in 2025" and was a key player in sanctions evasion, terrorist financing and transactions linked to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

It also extended sanctions upon Nobitex's chairman and co-founder, Amir Hossein Rad, current CEO Seyed Ali Khoee, and co-founders Ali and Mohammad Kharrazi, brothers from one of Iran's most politically connected families.

Who ever is doing those big chunks, please let me be an insider ????

The post was about ETH prices and what it would look like 5 years from now (back in 2021).
https://www.reddit.com/r/ethtrader/comments/nqhrgw/comment/h0b61ry/?context=3

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.

Rules:

• All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
• Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
• Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
• Comments will be sorted by newest first.

Useful Links:

• Beginner Resources
• Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs ????
• MOONs Wiki Page
• r/CryptoCurrency Discord
• r/CryptoCurrencyMemes
• Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.)
• r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance.

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

• u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads.

So today BTC had a huge red day and it might be due to Saylor selling those 32BTC.

SRTC tanked to $95. And MSTR lost 10% or so.

Every cycle it seems some business accelerates a crypto crash.

In 2014 it was MtGox

In 2018 it was Craig Wright and his BSV

In 2022 it was SBF

Who here thinks if BTC keeps dropping, he will have to sell more BTC to pay the STRC dividend and end up causing a feedback loop where he sells, and BTC goes down further and he needs to sell more to pay down his debt.

Eventually MSTR goes under and bitcoin bottoms around Oct/Nov like previous cycles and we moon in 2028?

Attempting to move KSM & some DOGE out of the wallet but I'm receiving errors or failed transfers. Whats going on with this wallet?

Yesterday btc tumbled below $67k, down nearly 6% in a single session which is lowest level since april. Spot bitcoin etfs recorded $1.42 billion in outflows as investor sentiment turned risk off and meanwhile nvidia closed at an ath, microsoft is up 34% this year and the ai infrastructure trade is printing.

Which means money rotated,investors are moving out of crypto amid continued market uncertainty, as higher performing sectors such as AI offer alternatives and thats yahoo finance's straight read on yesterday's session.

the thing worth sitting with is that btc's ath was $126k in oct 2025 and now trading at $67k which 47% below if i m not wrong, while the broader narrative around it has never been more institutionally accepted like etfs approved, genius act signed into law, corporate treasuries holding BTC, sovereign wealth funds circling so the macro setup looks better than 2021 but the price doesnt.....

Capital that came into crypto looking for asymmetric upside has found a new home,why hold Bitcoin at $67k hoping for a run back to $126k when you can buy nvidia, palantir or get leveraged exposure to the nasdaq 24/7 through onchain platforms like ostium without ever leaving your wallet? The risk on trade has just moved.

The counterargument I keep hearing is that crypto and ai are different asset classes serving different purposes and btc is a store of value ,thats true in theory but in practice the same retail and institutional dollars chase both, and rn one of them is working and one isnt.

Three catalysts I m watching that could reverse the rotation are the openai ipo this fall creating a liquidity event that sends money back into risk assets broadly, a fed rate cut that lifts all boats or a genuine btc narrative reset,maybe somethiing new

Until one of those lands i think the ai trade continues to eat crypto's lunch on a relative basis.

What do u think is this rotation temporary or does crypto need a new narrative to compete with the ai infrastructure trade?

From the article;

In a letter dated June 1 to Acting Secretary of Labor Keith Sonderling, the senators and top Democrat of the House Committee on Education and Workforce, Rep. Robert "Bobby" Scott, said the proposed rule would expose people to more risk.

"The proposed rule would establish a so-called safe harbor for fiduciaries who offer alternative investments in retirement plans," they said in the letter. "This would strip long-held investor protections from retirement savers and encourage the use of more risky, complex, and expensive investments."

It hasn't been long and I'm already annoyed by the panic around this. MSTR is a company. It had convertible debt on it's balance sheet. That debt was going to come due soon. The maturity of that convertible debt would have diluted current shareholders of MSTR. Instead of letting this happen, MSTR sold BTC and cleared some of it's convertible debt. All future debt raised by MSTR will likely be through its preferred offerings of STRC, STRF, STRD, etc... Clearing Convertible debt and raising future capital through preferred equity liabilities is a not just a good thing. It's a great thing - for MSTR shareholders, for preferred shares investors, and for BTC holders. The panic around MSTR selling 0.0038% of it's total BTC holdings is just pure lunacy.

I second guess the whole thing now more than ever.

If there is one single thing that I would have always said is Bitcoin's main purpose, it is to have inflation-resistant money. That's the main purpose of it, to me.

It wasn't so obvious back then. Pre-COVID, you could pontificate about inflation to people and they were confused about why you're even talking about about that. Like you're worried about something that's never going to happen. It's fine. The US Dollar is fine.

Fast forward to 2026 and now EVERYONE understands at least on some level that inflation is eroding their quality of life away. The US dollar is NOT fine. Most people are very shocked with the prices they're seeing in stores.

If you told me in 2019 what the prices of groceries were going to be in 2026 priced in USD, I would be sure that everyone is starting to understand the importance of money that can't just be printed out of thin air.

And yet here we are. Everyone sees the prices of literally everything going up. Everyone understands on some level that inflation = bad. I would have guessed everyone would be pouring themselves into BTC to escape. But the price is floundering and it feels like there's not much upside left.

You could have outperformed BTC in the past few years just by investing in a boring index fund instead.

I wonder if this is just the calm before the storm in the next cycle? Or is humanity just too stupid for this to ever stick?

How do you guys think the next 5 years plays out?

Hey!

I'm building a tool designed to simplify tracking and manage token vesting schedules across different protocols.

I'm looking for a small group of people who receive tokens from launchpads, crypto payroll, team vestings etc, through investor allocations, advisor allocations etc, to check out the product and give some feedback - in return for free access to our paid plan when we launch.

Some of the problems we're trying to solve:

• Tracking allocations across multiple protocols
• Remembering unlock and claim dates
• Understanding what's claimable and when
• Getting a clearer view of your overall vesting portfolio

If this sounds relevant to you and you'd be interested in trying an early version, drop a comment or send me a DM.

I'd love to hear about your current workflow and biggest frustrations as well.

Thank you in advance.

What are your opinions on investing in the Standard & Poor’s 500 (SNP 500) instead of the SNP6900?

from the article.

The Arkham page currently marks the transferred bitcoin as "unspent," and it remains unclear whether the funds would be used for future creditor repayments. Large bitcoin movements in the past have often preceded distributions to creditors.

Tuesday's transactions marked the entity's first bitcoin movement since late March, when it shifted a relatively small amount of bitcoin between its wallets.

Mt. Gox currently holds 34,504 BTC, valued at roughly $2.43 billion, across its wallets, per Arkham data.

I came across a post on the Bitcoin Talk Forum that raised an interesting criticism of Michael Saylor's Bitcoin strategy.

The idea is that Bitcoin was created as a scarce asset with a fixed supply of 21 million coins and as an alternative to debt-based financial systems. However, Strategy keeps issuing new shares, preferred stock, and debt to raise capital and buy more Bitcoin.

The argument isn't that Saylor is creating new Bitcoin he obviously isn't. Rather, it's that he's creating more and more financial claims backed by Bitcoin, which some people see as recreating the same credit-based system Bitcoin was originally designed to replace.

Do you think this criticism is valid? Is Saylor helping Bitcoin adoption by bringing it into traditional capital markets, or is he building a Bitcoin version of the financial system Bitcoin was meant to disrupt?

Curious to hear both bullish and bearish perspectives.

​

Over the past few months I've been trying to understand why the same names keep appearing in tokenization discussions:

DTCC

HSBC

JPMorgan

Goldman Sachs

BNY Mellon

Nasdaq

BlackRock

Fidelity

At first I thought this was a crypto story.

Now I think it's a financial infrastructure story.

The strongest evidence isn't coming from crypto companies. It's coming from the institutions that already operate the financial system.

DTCC, which sits at the center of U.S. securities settlement, is moving forward with a tokenization service and plans limited production trading of tokenized securities in 2026. More than 50 firms are participating in the effort. DTCC also announced plans to tokenize DTC-custodied U.S. Treasury securities on Canton Network.

HSBC recently completed a pilot issuing, transferring, and atomically settling tokenized deposits on Canton. This wasn't a crypto experiment. It was a test involving bank deposits, one of the core building blocks of modern finance.

Meanwhile, JPMorgan's Kinexys platform, tokenized Treasuries, tokenized money market funds, and stablecoin legislation are all pointing toward the same destination: a financial system built on digital, programmable assets.

This is where Canton becomes interesting.

Unlike many blockchain projects, Canton was designed specifically for regulated financial markets. Privacy, compliance, interoperability, and institutional controls are not afterthoughts—they are the primary design goals. That's why organizations such as DTCC, HSBC, Goldman Sachs, BNY Mellon, and others continue appearing around the ecosystem.

The bigger question for investors is whether the network succeeds or whether the token succeeds.

Those are not the same thing.

Many networks generate activity while their tokens capture little value. What caught my attention with Canton Coin (CC) is the burn-mint equilibrium model.

Recent reports indicate:

Burn-to-mint ratio increased from roughly 0.15 to 0.65 in about six months.

Daily burns increased from roughly 5 million CC to more than 15 million CC.

A January 2026 halving reduced emissions.

Protocol fees reached approximately $66.6 million in April 2026.

The critical number is not price.

It's the burn-to-mint ratio.

If network adoption continues growing and the ratio eventually exceeds 1.0, the network would become net deflationary. That would mean institutional usage is consuming more CC than the network is creating.

Today CC trades around a $6 billion market capitalization. The market is effectively trying to answer one question:

Will Canton become a niche institutional blockchain, or will it become part of the core operating system for tokenized finance?

Nobody knows the answer yet.

But for the first time, I find myself paying more attention to DTCC announcements, tokenized Treasuries, tokenized deposits, and Canton network statistics than I do to most crypto narratives.

The canary in the coal mine isn't tokenized stocks.

It's whether institutions start treating tokenized deposits, tokenized Treasuries, and digital collateral as normal financial infrastructure.

If that happens, we may look back on this period the same way we look back on the early internet—not as the emergence of a new asset class, but as the rebuilding of the rails underneath the entire system.

Do you think there will be mass institutional adoption of crypto 10 years from now and how much do you think btc will be at that time?

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.

Rules:

• All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
• Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
• Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
• Comments will be sorted by newest first.

Useful Links:

• Beginner Resources
• Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs ????
• MOONs Wiki Page
• r/CryptoCurrency Discord
• r/CryptoCurrencyMemes
• Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.)
• r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance.

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

• u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads.

Biggest lesson I’ve learnt in 9 years of crypto is that almost everything worth understanding comes back to Bitcoin! I want to share it with YOU:

BTC is the bedrock of the entire market mainly because most assets are influenced by/traded in pairs with it, and because liquidity, sentiment and capital flows still orbit Bitcoin whether people like it or not.

I’ve watched people spend years chasing narratives etc, and I think that’s a mistake.

Everybody should start off in crypto with learning about Bitcoin and why it moves, what the halving cycle is, and what dominance means and why liquidity operates the way it does.

The reason Bitcoin’s so predictable isn’t by fluke. It’s because the most important variable affecting it is visible years in advance. Every 4 years the issuance of new Bitcoin is cut in half. The supply shock is hard coded into the protocol. Everyone knows it’s coming yet the market repeatedly underestimates the impact of reducing new supply entering circ.

Most people focus entirely on demand and end up obsessing over news, influencers, regs, and a load of macro events they would’ve been better off ignoring.

Instead they ignore the fact Bitcoin is one of the only assets in the world where future supply schedule is known with certainty decades in advance.

That doesn’t mean Bitcoin only goes up and it doesn’t mean every cycle is identical.

It means there are underlying mechanics driving the market that are literally predictable and that will help you time the bottoms and peaks.

One of the biggest lessons from 2024-2026 is that Bitcoin remained predictable while people’s assumptions about the rest of the market did not.

The halving worked and Bitcoin led the market exactly as it always has but what changed was the structure of liquidity surrounding it.

Bitcoin gains used to spill into the rest of the market through a highly reflexive cycle. Bitcoin would rise, profits would rotate into large caps, then mids, then small caps, and almost everything would go up regardless of quality.

We came to believe that this process was automatic…

It wasn’t!

The halving didn’t “break” and neither did Bitcoin; the liquidity structure simply changed.

Institutional capital entered through ETFs, custodians and regulated investment vehicles, so instead of circulating through the wider crypto ecosystem capital remained concentrated around Bitcoin itself.

The result was that Bitcoin continued behaving largely as expected while many people’s assumptions about alt season failed.

Bitcoin is not important because it guarantees that every coin will go up.

Bitcoin is important because it remains the central organising force of the entire market.

Most people spend their time trying to predict thousands of assets. I think that’s backwards.

If you understand Bitcoin you’re already studying the single most important variable in crypto.

The further I’ve gone into this industry the less interested I’ve become in altcoins and narratives and the more interested I’ve become in understanding Bitcoin itself. That’s where the signal is. Everything else is mostly noise.

Bitcoin is the closest thing this industry has to an investment thesis built on observable mechanics rather than hope.

The rest increasingly resembles speculation layered on top of whatever Bitcoin decides to do next.

You don’t need to understand ten thousand coins.

You do need to understand the one asset that ten thousand coins and market participants are reacting to.

We are now in a bear market and the bottom will likely be hit late q4 - early q1 2027.

Supply issuance will halve again in 2028, and like clockwork once difficulty adjusts, price will trend up again.

But because the liquidity has changed. That doesn’t mean your alts will also go up. They are now mostly unpredictable.

Maybe they always was, but it took for the heavy dilution and institutional capture we’ve seen for us to truly accept this.

So stick with bitcoin.

Time buys around cycle lows.

Hodl until post halving highs.

Enjoy sleeping at night knowing you aren’t going to lose your entire net worth gambling.

Oh, and don’t expect to get “rich”

You need big money to make big money, we are not early anymore.

my friend posted in our discord that he used andrew tate’s “bonus” code or whatever and got $2700 USD from it. i don’t know the first thing about crypto, but i do know tate is notorious for crypto scams. is this legit or is my friend about to get screwed over?

Recently Jamie Dimon was on Fox and he was not a happy pumpkin to say the least. It seems for whatever reason the clarity act is under the skin of the major banks with Dimon saying he wont stop without a fight which has me thinking what if the banks are the ones purposely trying to crash crypto prices to harm crypto firms ahead of the clarity negotiations?

Have Stablecoins Already Won? Serious question. A few years ago, most crypto discussions were about replacing banks, replacing fiat, and becoming a new financial system.

Now it feels like stablecoins are quietly becoming the most practical crypto product instead.

Payments.
Remittances.
Settlement.
Treasury management.
Cross-border transfers.

Do you think stablecoins end up being crypto's biggest success story, or is something bigger still coming?

​

Risk assets are starting to price in a deal being done, Brent crude is significantly lower but then strikes from the USA and Iran panic everyone that the deal is not as near as we think. So how is crypto reacting? Well initially, there was positive movement upwards on rumours and talk of a deal being near but the move wasn’t protracted. However, in response to the strikes, crypto came off a fair bit so clearly there is still fear there in markets. The S and P is trading above levels it was at when the USA initially began the war with Iran. It’s surprising to a lot of market participants especially with oil trading as high as it has but underscores the belief that a deal and resolution is coming no doubt with free access to the Straits of Hormuz.

Downside risks are in play if the war was to really escalate again. With the rumours that Masoud Pezeshkian has offered his resignation due to a complete takeover of power by the IRGC, it seems less likely the war will escalate again and more likely that in fighting within the Iranian regime could lead potentially to regime collapse or civil strife. Still we must be aware that Dogecoin could fall below 8 cents were things to really escalate and Bitcoin below 60,000 USD.

For the upside, clearly a deal that brings the war to an end AND facilitates the free shipping of oil through the Straits of Hormuz is going to be bullish for the crypto space. It always takes time for the full effects of major news to filter through to markets as banks and funds position themselves. I would expect if a deal is signed and agreed that Dogecoin heads towards 16 cents which is quite a major level. The previous double bottom at 11.70 cents acted as resistance but with the creaky ceasefire that was not really surprising. Similar story to my previous call, long at 8.5 cents as mentioned previously looking a good trade and an exit of a partial amount of it at 11.5 cents with a view to running the rest higher towards 16 cents. There may be plenty of momentum by that time though and a case for holding the rest to move higher. Always keep in mind that digital assets can range trade without much volume and suddenly explode on news and the arrival of volume.

Until next time….stay displined

I didn't see the announcement in bybit in which they will delist the token. Now the spot is closed i want to convert back it to ETH

Going to write this out because I see new accounts about to step into the same trap I did last year, and the post might save somebody two thousand dollars and ten months of holding a bag.

Last summer I bought XLM around fifty cents on the Protocol 23 narrative. The release candidate had just dropped, PYUSD was about to launch on Stellar, the institutional adoption thread was everywhere on my timeline. I sized into the position thinking the catalyst stack would carry the token comfortably to eighty cents.

The upgrade shipped. PYUSD went live. None of it mattered. By May 22 of this year XLM had a daily close of fourteen cents, which is 72 percent below my entry. Ten months of holding, ten months of watching every announcement that was supposed to support the price fail to do anything for it. I closed most of the position at the lows and learned my lesson the hard way.

Last week the DTCC headline broke and the same exact playbook started running. Short liquidations off the announcement, viral threads about Stellar finally winning institutional integration, projections of forty cents and beyond. The chart looks identical to where I was sitting a year ago, and the institutional brand attached to the headline is bigger this time which only makes the FOMO worse.

The first lesson from holding the July 2025 bag is that the price moves on the anticipation, not on the actual integration. By the time the catalyst ships, the headline has been traded for months and there is nobody left to sell to at higher prices. The DTCC integration goes live in the first half of 2027. The current price is essentially borrowing all the upside from that future event right now.

The second lesson is that institutional partnerships do not automatically translate into token demand. Tokenized assets on Stellar are issued by DTCC and settle in USDC. The fee paid in XLM is zero in dollar terms regardless of volume. The protocol gets used, the token sits there. Same as it did with PYUSD after that launch.

I sold the small remainder of my XLM into this rally and I am not chasing it back in. If the integration actually flows real volume through Stellar in 2027, the token can reprice on that data. Until then, the structure of this move is the same setup that cost me a year of opportunity cost the first time around.

Posting because I see new accounts asking whether to buy at $0.27 and somebody needs to tell them what holding the previous version of this trade actually looks like at the end.

Back in 2021 BSC mania I was approached by the founder of MoneyShot which was a token tied to the adult industry. Dev wanted exposure through my Twitter account and as part of that he sent me 5 billion HOT tokens at launch

My % was valued at around 1 dollar (LOL)

I remember looking into the project and getting a bad feeling about it. I didn’t like the adult narrative and the dev seemed far more excited about rugging my audience than building an actual product

I decided I wanted nothing to do with it but I already held a measly 1 dollar in worthless tokens

Most people would’ve just held them and sold at the first pump

Instead I decided to just give them all away

All 5 billion of them…

THE ENTIRE ONE DOLLAR ????

I started sending millions of HOT tokens to random followers and community members

My thinking was if this thing is going to end badly I’d rather the community have some fun with these tokens than sit on a giant allocation from a founder I don’t trust

The giveaway itself created attention

Twitter started talking about HOT

Holder counts exploded

Transactions exploded

More people discovered the token

The chart started moving

HOT went from 9->4 zeros

So from around 0.0000000002 to roughly 0.00002

A 100,000x move

Yes you read that correctly, a one hundred thousand X

So that 5 billion HOT I’d originally been given was worth around $100,000 at the peak

Except I didn’t own them anymore

I’d already given them all away

So while everyone else was celebrating the pump I was sitting there watching a 6 figure position that “could’ve” been mine

Eventually the token collapsed and everyone started dumping on each other

Accusations started flying and somehow I ended up being blamed despite the fact I never sold a single HOT token because I no longer had any

Dev was calling me on telegram from Australia threatening to kill me??? ????

To this day I think it’s one of the funniest and most absurd lessons I’ve learned in crypto

I tried to stop a founder from eventually dumping a giant allocation on people by giving the bag away

The giveaway itself helped create the hype that sent the token vertical but put me in the spotlight as the “shiller”

And the one person who didn’t make any money from it was me

But I held ALL the corn for the downfall

Moral of the story, if anyone gives you a dollar, treat it like $100k ????

Has anyone else got a crypto story this ridiculous?

I hold a lot of memecoins and am considering selling them off before the clarity act. I try to stick to memecoins with above a 50m market cap. My favorite is Toshi, but I just don't know if the clarity act will make those tokens worthless. I've tried doing my research on it but always end up with ambiguous answers. I wanna know what the crypto community thinks.

I've been active in crypto discussions for a few years now and Solana keeps coming up in conversations about speed and real-world usage. Instead of just repeating the marketing numbers, I wanted to break down how the core tech actually works and what I've observed from monitoring the network over multiple cycles. It's easy to get caught up in TPS claims, but looking at the mechanics and the practical trade-offs gives a clearer picture.

Solana combines Proof of History with Proof of Stake. Proof of History acts like a built-in timestamp that lets validators agree on time without constantly chatting back and forth. This is different from pure Proof of Stake chains where every node has to reach consensus on ordering through more communication. By creating a verifiable sequence of events ahead of time, the network can process transactions in parallel more efficiently. Under good conditions this leads to block times around 400 milliseconds and fees that stay fractions of a cent. I've seen periods where it handled thousands of transactions per second, especially during NFT mint events where demand spiked hard.

One example that stood out was the early 2022 NFT launches on platforms like Magic Eden. The volume was intense and the chain showed it could keep moving, but it also exposed limits when things got extreme. There were moments of congestion that led to degraded performance rather than total failure. Those incidents highlighted that while the architecture scales well in theory, validator load and network conditions still matter. Since then upgrades have focused on better leader scheduling and stake-weighted quality of service to reduce single points of overload.

If you're thinking about allocating any capital here, practical monitoring becomes essential. Tracking the number of active validators and their uptime gives a sense of resilience. Solana has had several outages tied to high demand or software bugs, and recovery times varied. Looking at metrics like validator count growth helps show whether decentralization is improving. Early on there were valid concerns about a smaller set of validators holding significant stake, partly because the bootstrap phase favored certain operators. As the network matured more independent validators joined, but stake distribution still leans toward larger pools. This doesn't automatically mean centralization risk in daily operation, but it does affect how quickly the network can recover from incidents.

Another angle worth watching is developer activity and total value locked trends. TVL on Solana has fluctuated with market cycles, yet certain DeFi protocols and gaming projects have maintained steady usage even during bear phases. Developer commits and new project launches on the chain offer clues beyond price action. When you compare this to other layer one chains claiming similar speeds, the differences come down to how each handles state and execution. Solana's single global state and runtime choices allow high throughput but require careful optimization from app developers to avoid hitting bottlenecks.

Competition from chains like Aptos, Sui, or even established players with rollup strategies is worth considering. Each approaches speed differently, whether through parallel execution, different consensus tweaks, or modular designs. Solana's bet on a monolithic high-speed base layer has delivered real activity in niches like memecoins and NFTs, but it faces ongoing questions about reliability during peak load. After past incidents the team has implemented changes like Turbine improvements and better priority fees, which seem to have helped stability in subsequent stress tests.

Centralization worries from the initial validator distribution haven't fully disappeared. Growth has brought more participants, yet a meaningful portion of stake remains with entities that were early supporters. This setup can lead to faster decision making on upgrades but raises eyebrows during governance or outage recovery discussions. On the positive side, the low barrier for running a validator in terms of hardware requirements compared to some alternatives has encouraged broader experimentation.

Recovery prospects after network events depend on how quickly fixes are deployed and how the community responds. Past downtime led to coordinated restarts and patches that addressed root causes like duplicate signature handling. Each cycle seems to strengthen the operational side, though it also shows that no high-throughput design is immune to edge cases when usage explodes unexpectedly.

What keeps pulling me back to following Solana is how the combination of architecture and ecosystem growth creates tangible experiments in scalable applications. It's not just theoretical TPS; people are actually building and using things that benefit from the speed. At the same time the trade-offs around occasional instability and stake concentration require ongoing attention rather than blind optimism.

I've noticed that separating short-term price moves from these fundamentals helps in making more grounded decisions. Validator health, recent upgrade impacts, and comparative TVL across similar chains provide better signals than hype cycles alone. If you've been running nodes, developing on the chain, or just tracking these metrics yourself, what stands out to you as the biggest improvement or remaining risk area?

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.

Rules:

• All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
• Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
• Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
• Comments will be sorted by newest first.

Useful Links:

• Beginner Resources
• Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs ????
• MOONs Wiki Page
• r/CryptoCurrency Discord
• r/CryptoCurrencyMemes
• Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.)
• r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance.

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

• u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads.

Adam Back has got the Satoshi debate trending on X again, so I'm opening it up right here on reddit! I've compiled a timeline of significant cryptographic milestones that ultimately led up to the creation of Bitcoin. Read it, refresh your memory, and then in the comments tell me who YOU think Satoshi was and WHY:

1982 David Chaum invents blind signatures

1984 Chaum forms cryptography research group at CWI

1990 Chaum incorporates Digicash, built on top of banking infrastructure

1994 Adam Back starts exploring primitives of PoW

1996 NSA Release How To Make A Mint whitepaper citing cryptographer Tatsauki Okamoto

1997 Adam Back releases PoW

1998 Wei Dei publishes B-money

1998 Szabo develops bitgold

1999 Chaum liquidates and sells assets out of the bankruptcy liquidation. This forms a brand new company called eCash Technologies Inc. based in Washington, USA

2000 Earliest identified public email threads between Len Sassaman and Hal Finney

2001 SHA256 standardised by NIST (designed by NSA), later used by BTC extensively. Without this bitcoins consensus mechanism that solved double spending would not work

2004 David Chaum begins advising at KU Leauven

2004) Hal works on RPOW

2004 Len Sassaman (rabbi@quickie.net) becomes student of David Chaum and Bart Preneel at KU Leauven

2008 Satoshi/Bitcoin descends from e-cash/cyberpunk/hashcash/RPOW ideas, combining all of the greatest cryptographic ideas developed over 30 years.

2010 Len Sassaman starts posting on twitter in a way that suggest he is skeptical of the government and also the direction of Bitcoin… he clearly didn’t like the idea of gov intrusion or centralization

March 2010 Epstein sought contact with Meredith Patterson (Len Sassaman's partner) via Pablos. Pablos is Len Sassaman's “friend” and also Epsteins tech networker.

April 2011 Bitcoin is announced as handed over to Gavin by Satoshi.

(NEXT DAY) Gavin announces he will speak about Bitcoin at CIA HQ

(2 DAYS BEFORE CIA HQ TALK) Epstein emails Gavin to arrange a call about Bitcoin and the "serious risks", Gavin declines.

June 2011 Gavin meets with the CIA about BTC.

July 2011 Len Sassaman suicide (rest in peace legend)

Aug 2014 Hal Finney passes away (rest in peace legend)

Satoshi wallet remains untouched.

My opinion is that NO human would sit on $135 billion+ of theoretical wealth and not touch it.

Unless they are dead.

Or unless it was the intel agencies watching these guys that orchestrated BTC. Most of these guys were known to each other in the decades that led up to 2008. Intelligence agencies heavily monitored PGP, cypherpunk forums, and mailing lists during the 1990s and early 2000s. They were also at Len Sassaman's code pen events.

The NSA Presence: NSA and FBI agents subscribed to the list servs to log every message, track user handles (nyms), and stay updated on software developments.

The ECHELON Network: Run by the Five Eyes alliance (US, UK, CA, AU, NZ), this global interception network used keyword triggers to automatically flag internet traffic. Emails containing words related to PGP, keys, or specific cypherpunk manifestos were funneled into agency databases.

Bulk Personal Datasets: Leaked disclosures also revealed that UK agencies like GCHQ and MI5 began secretly vacuuming up bulk internet communications and personal datasets in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Anyone actively discussing or utilizing PGP automatically stood out as a high-value anomaly in this metadata.

SO, WHO DO YOU THINK SATOSHI WAS? AND WHY?

Seventeen months and still no answer. And I see all post querying anything about gate (and there were lots) have been purged.

Things that make you go hmmm.

I'm getting paid in USDC on Solana for a job and need an app that offers a debit card, since direct transfers to and from crypto exchanges are restricted in all of my local banks. It seems like most of the major options aren't available in many African countries, and so far Kask.xyz looks like the best option. Is there anything better I should consider?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=304oLDxx30c&ra=m

Interesting thoughts in - I personally think the quantum threat will become real in 5y, what do you think?

After nearly a decade in crypto, countless cycles, thousands of hours of research, and more mistakes than I’d like to admit, I’ve finally figured it out! Most investors are looking for the wrong things. It’s not market cap, tokenomics, partnerships, influencers, narratives, AI, memes, or even RWA…

There is exactly ONE thing that consistently predicts long-term success.

& after applying that formula, I have compiled the definitive list of every cryptocurrency besides Bitcoin and Ethereum worth buying in 2026:

1) There isn’t one.
2) There isn’t one.
3) There isn’t one.

Good luck ????

I'll admit I was confused for a while. Every time someone said stake Bitcoin, I assumed they meant wrapping it or sending it to some sketchy platform. That's not staking, that's just lending with extra steps.

But native BTC staking is different. You keep your Bitcoin on the main chain. No bridges, no wrapped tokens, no handing over your keys.

I used to think BTC couldn't have trustless yield. Now it can. Not saying it's risk-free, but it's not the wrapped-token nightmare I thought it was.

Anyone else just realizing this?

Here's a fun thought experiment for you all:

Is there an abandoned cryptocurrency that a single person could realistically acquire a controlling economic stake in using nothing more than public market purchases?

Imagine you are NOT interested in mining, staking, governance attacks, private deals, or tracking down founders and convincing them to sell their bags. You want to know whether it's possible to become the dominant stakeholder in a cryptocurrency the same way someone accumulates shares in a public company:

By simply buying what is available on the open market.

This sounds easy enough at first.

Crypto is littered with abandoned projects, I'm talking THOUSANDS of blockchains that have launched over the years that have lost their communities, development teams, and any meaningful reason to exist. The internet is essentially a graveyard of forgotten cryptocurrencies.

So we start by building a set of criteria:

Lets say the project has to be launched between 2009-2018. Development has to be effectively dead for at least 5 years. The community needs to be largely nonexistent. More than 90% of the supply must be unlocked and circulating. There can't be a foundation, treasury, or major stakeholder controlling a significant portion of the supply. It still has to be tradable on a functioning exchange with working withdrawals, and it needs to have both a market cap under $100,000 and daily trading volume under $500

The more you refine the criteria, its human nature to become increasingly confident you'll uncover dozens of candidates

But you will actually discover the criteria is almost self-contradictory.

The first problem is that genuinely abandoned projects tend not to remain tradable. Once development stops and the community disappears, exchanges eventually delist them. Even if the blockchain itself continues running the asset often becomes inaccessible because there is simply nowhere left to buy it.

Then you'll start running into the opposite problem. Projects that are still listed often aren't truly abandoned. Some still have active Telegram groups. Others still have maintainers pushing occasional updates. Some have foundations sitting on enormous treasury allocations. They look dead at first glance but there is almost always somebody still steering the ship.

I tried this all for fun and the deeper I went the stranger the problem became.

I had originally assumed that low market cap would make acquisition easier. If a coin had a $20,000 market cap surely it couldn't be that difficult to buy a large percentage of it.

What I failed to appreciate is that market cap and availability are completely different things.

A token can have a market cap of $20,000 and still be impossible to acquire. In most cases the overwhelming majority of supply is locked away in dormant wallets that haven't moved in years. Some holders lost their keys. Some forgot the project existed. Some disappeared entirely. The supply technically exists but it might as well be buried underground.

This created a paradox I naively hadn't anticipated when I went into this.

Obviously the more abandoned a cryptocurrency is, the less purchasable it is.

The ideal candidate needed to be dead enough that nobody cared about it anymore but alive enough that it was still functioning. It needed to have no meaningful community yet still have an exchange listing. It needed to have no active development yet still maintain enough infrastructure for deposits and withdrawals to work. It needed to be forgotten but not completely forgotten.

After digging through project after project I started to suspect that what I was looking for simply didn't exist.

Then I found "BOLI"

Bolivarcoin is a token launched in 2015 with the original goal of serving as a Venezuelan-focused digital currency. Today almost nobody talks about it. Development appears effectively dormant. Community activity is minimal. The market cap is tiny. Daily trading volume is almost nonexistent.

It was one of the first projects I found that didn't immediately fail one of my filters.

The blockchain still runs.

The supply is largely circulating.

There is no meaningful foundation controlling it.

The exchange listing still exists.

Withdrawals still appear to function.

The project is (for lack of a better term) alive in the same way an abandoned building is alive. Nobody is really using it, nobody is maintaining it, but somehow it is still standing

At this point the investigation stopped being about market structure and became a thought experiment.

Because if somebody did manage to accumulate a dominant stake in a project like this, what exactly would they own?

The obvious answer is that they would probably be better off launching their own token.

Creating a token today is trivial, you can legit spin one up in minutes, control the supply, define the branding, and start from a completely clean slate.

But that's also what makes something like BOLI interesting.

Launching a new token is like buying an empty plot of land and building a house

Acquiring a dominant stake in an abandoned cryptocurrency is like buying a decaying Victorian mansion for the cost of a used car. The roof leaks. The plumbing barely works. Half the rooms haven't been opened in years. But it exists. It has history. It has infrastructure. Somebody built it. People once cared about it.

Could somebody revive it? Probably not.

Could they rebrand it? Maybe.

Could they turn it into a digital museum dedicated to preserving abandoned cryptocurrency projects? Honestly that might be one of the more sensible things crypto has attempted.

Would any of this be a good idea? Almost certainly not.

But that's not really what I found interesting.

What surprised me was that after spending hours searching through the ruins of old crypto projects, I didn't discover a hidden gem or an overlooked investment opportunity. I discovered that the market structure itself prevents most of these opportunities from existing in the first place.

At a first thought its easy to assume you will find hundreds of abandoned cryptocurrencies that could theoretically be bought out by a determined individual.

Instead I found that the intersection between "dead," "functional," and "purchasable" is incredibly small.

BOLI wasn't interesting because it was valuable, it's interesting because it was one of the few projects I could find that somehow survived being unsuccessful. And for a forgotten cryptocurrency launched a decade ago, that might be the strangest achievement of all!

RIP BOLI!

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.

Rules:

• All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
• Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
• Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
• Comments will be sorted by newest first.

Useful Links:

• Beginner Resources
• Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs ????
• MOONs Wiki Page
• r/CryptoCurrency Discord
• r/CryptoCurrencyMemes
• Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.)
• r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance.

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

• u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads.

A visited a so called "Edinburgh Decentralisation Index" that was supposed to find out what asset is the most decentralized and it was showing Cardano as the most decentralized (above bitcoin too) and I thought it was sus because I've seen many scams in the space to be that trusting.

Turns out I immediately found a "news" article with the title "Cardano builder IOG and University of Edinburgh to create first ever index to provide industry standard metric for crypto decentralization" and "faith" was restored in my suspicions.

PS when money is involved never trust any kind of article by third parties. Do your own research.

Hello guys! Just wanted to ask what is the best crypto wallet to receive crypto these days? I will mainly use it to receive payments from my virtual assistant job.

The more I've dug into "quantum resistant" crypto projects the more I've realised most investors (including me originally) misunderstand what that phrase actually means.

When I used to hear "Quantum resistant blockchain"

I used to interpret it as "This project is safe from quantum computers"

But I've learned that's not what it actually means at all.

What it really means is based on everything currently known, no practical quantum attack is known YET. RSA wasn't broken because quantum computers became faster. RSA was broken (theoretically) because Shor found a completely different way of looking at the problem. He found hidden structure that classical computers couldn't exploit efficiently. That's what initially got me thinking...

When blockchain projects market themselves as quantum resistant because they use lattice cryptography, are they saying "we know this is safe against future quantum algorithms" or are they saying "nobody has found the quantum equivalent of Shor yet"?

I actually went away and built a small research framework trying to understand this distinction better. What surprised me most wasn't that I found a way to break lattice cryptography (I obviously didn't), it was discovering how much uncertainty still exists underneath the marketing language. The cryptographic community does not claim lattice cryptography is quantum proof. The claim is much narrower and more like:

- no efficient quantum attack is currently known
- many smart people have looked
- several hardness reductions exist
- and lattices remain our strongest major post-quantum candidate

I am posting this to raise awareness because thats very different from these QR blockchains being immune from being broken. In finance people price uncertainty all the time but when it comes to post-quantum projects many investors seem to treat "quantum resistant" as if it means "solved forever". Personally I now think the question isn't whether lattice cryptography is broken, it's whether investors understand the difference between the best known candidate VS proven future proof technology... Most don't and I didnt until recently.

Curious how other people think about this.

When a blockchain markets itself as quantum resistant, what level of confidence do you think investors should actually attach to that claim?

TL;DR - You can't just point the finger at China and say, "China's banned bitcoin for the 500th time now. You have to understand the framework the government uses for it.

https://www.pbc.gov.cn/tiaofasi/144941/3581332/2026020619591971323/index.html

We already know Buying, selling, and mining in china is illegal, but somehow it still takes place.

In Hong Kong, SAR of China, crypto buying and selling is legal. If you're a Chinese company and you want to gain exposure to bitcoin / crypto, the only way is through getting an ETFs available from companies on the HK stock market exchange. No self-custody involved.

A lot of projects in China use referral code structures to bring in new people to the project. Some more recent buzz terms include "RWA" and similar terminology. Sometimes these can be legit. Other times these can just be ways to bring in other users. Typically, the way project owners make money from these is from transaction fees that go on within the RWA structure - which is often a Pyramid or MLM scheme.

People aren't supposed to promote these projects, so what I have seen is large amounts of people gathering at auditoriums and when they are in auditoriums, phones are temporarily confiscated and then returned to all participants. The atmosphere is generally positive, but you cannot escape the MLM vibe. However, when you search for information about these projects on the Chinese web, it is often sparse because it isn't safe (according to Chinese law) to attach one's face to promoting a cryptocurrency project in China.

How does funding take place? Often times from USDT on BSC. Are they all worth investing in? I cannot say. I can only say if you are looking into these projects, consider mitigating your exposure and if it seems legit, scale it up to as much as you are comfortable with.

EDIT: With regards to saying, "People aren't supposed to promote these projects." I believe this only applies to people living in China. At least, I don't think the CCP would care if a Chinese person living outside of China would be punished for promoting these projects.

Hey everyone,About a year ago I bought some Saitama (and a few other coins) directly through my MetaMask wallet. I hadn’t checked the account in around 12 months. When I opened it the other day, I nearly had a heart attack — it was showing roughly $375,000 profit, with Saitama priced at about $36.87.LiveCoinWatch is currently quoting around $35–37 for Saitama V2.I’m pretty sure this isn’t real, but I don’t understand how the price is showing so high. I only have 10,250 Saitama tokens.Questions:

• Has anyone else seen this with Saitama? Is it a data glitch or fake liquidity thing?
• If I try to sell/swap it on Uniswap, what will actually happen?
• What’s the easiest/safest way to move whatever real value is there to Swyftx (Australian exchange)?

I’m not a crypto expert and don’t want to lose anything to gas fees or mistakes. Any advice would be really appreciated. Happy to provide the contract address if needed.Thanks!

Created a wallet on orbimarkets.com. I have around $1k of SOL in it and and it's not letting me transfer it out. I tried transferring it to kraken and coinbase as a spot transfer but it didn't work. I tried converting it to eco crypto as USDT tether and that worked but still gives errors when trying to do the transfer. This site seems like a pretty legit place to trade and deposit crypto as I've never had a problem trading, I just have had a problem withdrawing.

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.

Rules:

• All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
• Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
• Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
• Comments will be sorted by newest first.

Useful Links:

• Beginner Resources
• Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs ????
• MOONs Wiki Page
• r/CryptoCurrency Discord
• r/CryptoCurrencyMemes
• Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.)
• r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance.

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

• u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads.

I wasn’t sure about it at first, but if he hates it, then I like it even more. Not Financial Advice obv. Fuck the banking system, the whole reason crypto exists is because they lost our trust. So this level of animosity should imo be seen as validation for it.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said at a Reagan Economic Forum event that the United States has seized $1 billion of Iranian cryptocurrency money as part of its effort to squeeze Iran’s economy. “Just outright grabbed the wallets,” Bessent said, referring to the accounts where digital currency is stored. “Some of them may be typing in right now and might not realize their wallet had been grabbed.”

When would you sell bitcoin, ethereum, or solana? I purchased a little while ago. Bitcoin I’m still up. Ethereum and solana I’m down a little. Would you cut losses or hold? I think they’ll come back up but not sure when or how high. What’s everyone else doing? Thanks!

Hodl documentary

Hello,

A few days ago, while logged into my account in the app on my iPhone, I selected “Add funds” and then “Share your deposit address.”

I had downloaded the app directly from the Apple App Store.

I chose a USDT address on Tron/TRC20 and sent a deposit to the address shown in the app. The transaction was confirmed on-chain.

However, I later saw that the USDT Tron/TRC20 deposit option/address was no longer available in the app. Between the time I generated the address in the app and the time I sent the deposit, I received no warning or notice that Tron deposits were being disabled or were no longer supported.

The deposit has since been sent back to the originating address, but it is still effectively lost and has not been credited or recovered to me.

Has anyone experienced something similar with ether.fi or TRC20 deposits? Is there any way to verify whether the deposit address belonged to them, and recover the funds if it did?

I’ve contacted support and asked them to credit or recover the deposit, but I’m concerned because the address disappeared from the app and the funds are still not available to me.

Thanks.

Hey everyone,

I wanted to put out a massive warning to any independent developers, Telegram bot creators, or web admins looking into using Coinremitter as a cryptocurrency payment gateway. They market themselves as having a tiny "0.23% processing fee," but it is a massive trap designed to completely drain small-scale accounts.

I recently integrated their API into my Telegram bot to process premium upgrades in Bitcoin. Everything looked fine on paper until my users paid their invoices.

Here is the exact math of how they drained my wallet:

• Total Invoices Paid by Users: 0.00053163 BTC (Roughly $39.00 USD at the time).
• What actually arrived in my external wallet: 0.00003138 BTC (Roughly $2.31 USD).

Because I had their "Auto-Withdraw" feature turned on, their system triggered a payout the exact second my balance cleared the minimum threshold. What they bury in their fine print is a massive, flat-rate internal withdrawal fee (charging me over 0.00045 BTC / $33.58 USD just to process the sweep), completely separate from the actual blockchain miner fee.

They essentially took a 14x bigger cut than what they actually paid out to me, completely wiping out my hard-earned revenue.

If you are a small developer, do not use Coinremitter. Your funds will get automatically swept and absorbed by their predatory flat withdrawal fees. If you're building on Telegram, migrate immediately to native Telegram Stars (XTR)—don't let these payment gateways scam you out of your code's profit.

Watch out guys. Always check the flat minimum withdrawal fees, not just the advertised percentage rate!

Website: coinremitter[.]com

They all follow BTC, but some move more/faster than others. Say BTC went back to the ATH price again. That is less than double what it is now. ETH has gone down more, so it would be over 2x what it is now. DOGE would be 3x. There is no reason they should follow the same patterns again, but if they did, which would be the winner?

MEV doesn't get talked about enough relative to how much it actually costs people.

Unless you're a whale, most traders know sandwich attacks exist in the abstract but have no idea how much they're losing to them or what the realistic protection options are.

There are several approaches worth knowing about and they work very differently from each other.

The problem

On a public blockchain, your transaction is visible from the moment you submit it until it's confirmed.

Block producers control ordering. Searcher bots scan the pending pool, identify profitable opportunities, and act in the gap between submission/confirmation.

The classic mechanic is a sandwich: a bot sees your pending swap, buys the same asset ahead of you, your trade executes at a worse price, the bot sells immediately after.

Worth noting: not all MEV is purely extractive. The same infrastructure can be used to intercept exploits mid-attack or close arbitrage gaps.

But for the average trader, the interaction is mostly one-directional.

Flashbots / private RPCs

Routes your transaction directly to block builders through a private channel rather than broadcasting to the public mempool. You don't change your wallet, you change the RPC endpoint. Billions of dollars of transactions have gone through this on Ethereum. Requires manual opt-in, so most users never bother.

• Transaction routed directly to block builders, never entering the public mempool
• The relay operator retains some visibility — trust is transferred, not eliminated

CoW Swap

Instead of submitting a raw transaction, you sign an intent describing what you want to trade. A network of bonded solvers competes to find the best execution path across onchain liquidity, private market maker inventory, and peer-to-peer matching. When two users want opposite sides of the same trade, CoW settles them directly with no mempool exposure.

• Solver competition can produce better pricing than standard DEX routes
• Protection is structural rather than cryptographic — delegated execution, not a sealed transaction

Railgun

Uses zk-SNARKs to shield token balances and transaction history inside an onchain privacy pool. Shielded assets sit in encrypted smart contracts deployed directly on various chains, no separate network or bridge required. From the outside, activity is not traceable to the user.

• Most comprehensive at the asset level — supports ERC-20s, NFTs, and private DeFi interactions
• Shielding and unshielding adds friction and a real proficiency bar

Near Intents

An outcome-based protocol where users specify what they want and solvers compete to fulfill it. Has a confidential mode that routes through a TEE-based bridge where token pairs, order sizes, and timing stay out of the public mempool until after execution. Standard intents without confidential mode still broadcast to solvers without privacy guarantees.

• Transaction details remain private and only become visible on the public chain after execution
• Confidential mode is opt-in — standard intents carry no privacy guarantees

Privana Finance

Execution happens inside a hardware enclave before anything reaches public infrastructure. Swap intents are signed inside the enclave, the private key never leaves it, and the enclave handles automation and rule-based execution without the user needing to be present.

• No relay to trust, no shielding step to manage
• Custody stays with the user throughout

These approaches sit on a spectrum from simple workarounds to cryptographic enforcement to hardware-sealed execution. Which one makes sense depends on who you are and what goals you have.

Disclosure: I am affiliated with Privana.

Ok folks, looking to add crypto to my portfolio.

My thesis is the genius act mandates stable coins to buy us treasuries. Ie stable coins are here to stay, especially since china and japan are reducing treasuries and us needs treasury buyers.

So I've thought eth, sol, tron and bnb as a broadbasket long term hold and stake as these run the infra on which stablecoin operate.

And since banks etc are also looking to tokenize deposits etc, they will probably need an interoperability layer so probably some chain link.

Does the thesis hold, and what would you suggest?

Apparently this coin is about to be pump and dumped, am I be screwed if I hold or will there be enough liquidity?

With countless crypto related scams, unsustainable hype and market volatility, one can't help but wonder: What real problem does Web3 actually solve?

Here is a massive one that is so commonplace it feels like it has always been there: frictionless global commerce.

Back in the day, early-stage startups had to jump through endless regulatory and technical hoops just to integrate a payment gateway. Even if they succeeded, they faced a second hurdle: convincing early adopters to trust them with their card details.

Stablecoins and self-custody wallets changed that.

Today, a startup can deploy a secure payment structure in hours, not months. More astonishing, users don’t need to "trust" the platform with their financial data. They can simply connect a burner wallet, pay for the service, and safely disconnect. No card exposure, no deep trust required, no long term commitment needed.

Crypto isn't just changing finance; it overcame traditional payment bottlenecks, letting startups offer services/products now and ask for permission later.

The real thematic shift has been quietly occurring in 2026 and the vast majority of retail crypto traders still have not yet caught on to it: Agentic AI & Cryptocurrency.

Under 1.0% of total crypto trading and settlement volumes are related to Agentic AI Coins. While specific precise percentages vary depending on the data source, the broader AI and DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure) sector accounted for roughly $15 billion to $20 billion in combined market capitalization, making it the top-performing thematic asset class despite broader market downturns while tokens like $VVV outperform the entire crypto market.

This sectors next evolution is the spawning of autonomous agents that don’t just advise, they ACT: they trade, negotiate, pay for computing power, optimize DeFi yields, and settle agent-to-agent deals 24/7 without the need for your supervision. The only rails that actually work for them are Cryptocurrencies.

At first glance, this should be obvious as these agents can’t open a bank account, possess no SSN, and cannot perform a KYC (sorry fam, no agentic selfies yet). What they can do however is hold non-custodial wallets, push stablecoins, interact with smart contracts, and execute at machine speed.

That’s why we’re seeing protocols like Agent Payments, x402 on Coinbase, and Virtuals Protocol exploding as AI turns into an entire parallel economy of machine-to-machine commerce.

High-beta narrative with real teeth

When BTC rips on macro tailwinds, agent tokens and AI-crypto infrastructure names catch the alpha hard. FetchAI/ASI agents are optimizing trades, Virtuals are launching tokenized agents that earn their own revenue while NEAR is pushing agentic commerce. Think of it like Bitcoin’s little brother energy on steroids, except the “brother” is now a swarm of hyper-efficient digital entities.

But here’s the part most meme degens and crypto bros miss: Privacy isn’t optional. It’s survival

These agents can and will handle your capital, your data, and your strategies which means that every transaction & every decision leaves a trail unless you build it shielded. Imagine your trading agent getting front-run because its wallet history is public (something we're seeing with Polymarket Whales & Bots atm). Imagine again a personal agent negotiating deals while leaking your preferences, location, or net worth to chain-analysis firms and surveillance states (real). Governments are already cranking up KYC and CBDC tracking in that world, which means that agents operating in the open are just well-dressed snitches.

That’s why privacy tech like zk-proofs, shielded pools, and Zcash-style architecture becomes the moat. You want agents that prove they’re solvent or compliant without spilling the entire ledger. Optional privacy so your autonomous yield farmer can move size quietly, while your personal assistant can pay bills without broadcasting your lifestyle, and cross-border agent deals don’t trigger automatic flags. Privacy is the superpower you didn't know you needed in an agentic world.

It's important to note that these Agentic AI and Privacy narratives will only become more valuable as the cracks and flaws of traditional systems continue to become exposed. It's still quite early.

In conclusion, those who build & back the private, autonomous stack will define the next decade.

___________________________________________________________________________

I hope you enjoyed this little write-up, and i'm hoping to hear your thoughts and get a discussion going, especially contrarian opinions here as that's where the best discussions are born.

Thank you for reading!

___________________________________________________________________________

I feel it's coming. No one actually cares about the fundamentals of anything, you see techstocks at 900 P/E because of euphoria. One thing that is true is that corporations are buying crypto like never before. They're positioning themselves because of what is coming in the next 2 years on the leadup to the 2028 halving.

I think the news that GENIUS act won't pass is wrong. Both sides are all paid for by Isreal and they will play ball if there's money to be made.

My predictions are

BTC --> 200k
ETH ---> 20k (tenbagger, this is programmed)

XMR ---> $16k

in 2028, with the halving being the sell the news event.

I feel it's coming. No one actually cares about the fundamentals of anything, you see techstocks at 900 P/E because of euphoria. One thing that is true is that corporations are buying crypto like never before. They're positioning themselves because of what is coming in the next 2 years on the leadup to the 2028 halving.

I think the news that GENIUS act won't pass is wrong. Both sides are all paid for by Isreal and they will play ball if there's money to be made.

My predictions are

BTC --> 200k
ETH ---> 20k (tenbagger, this is programmed)

XMR ---> $16k

in 2028, with the halving being the sell the news event.

I feel it's coming. No one actually cares about the fundamentals of anything, you see techstocks at 900 P/E because of euphoria. One thing that is true is that corporations are buying crypto like never before. They're positioning themselves because of what is coming in the next 2 years on the leadup to the 2028 halving.

I think the news that GENIUS act won't pass is wrong. Both sides are all paid for by Isreal and they will play ball if there's money to be made.

My predictions are

BTC --> 200k
ETH ---> 20k (tenbagger, this is programmed)

XMR ---> $16k

in 2028, with the halving being the sell the news event.

I feel it's coming. No one actually cares about the fundamentals of anything, you see techstocks at 900 P/E because of euphoria. One thing that is true is that corporations are buying crypto like never before. They're positioning themselves because of what is coming in the next 2 years on the leadup to the 2028 halving.

I think the news that GENIUS act won't pass is wrong. Both sides are all paid for by Isreal and they will play ball if there's money to be made.

My predictions are

BTC --> 200k
ETH ---> 20k (tenbagger, this is programmed)

XMR ---> $16k

in 2028, with the halving being the sell the news event.

Genuinely curious, why hasn’t Binance listed $HYPE yet?

My first thought was they’re scared of competition, but that feels pretty lame. CZ is always tweeting about “making crypto great” and growing the entire space. It doesn’t make sense that they’d completely ignore one of the best performing coins of the entire cycle just because it’s from Hyperliquid.

Are there other reasons? Regulations? Technical issues? Or is it really just internal politics/ego?

Would love to hear all your thoughts.

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.

Rules:

• All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
• Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
• Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
• Comments will be sorted by newest first.

Useful Links:

• Beginner Resources
• Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs ????
• MOONs Wiki Page
• r/CryptoCurrency Discord
• r/CryptoCurrencyMemes
• Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.)
• r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance.

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

• u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads.

I am looking to get myself more invested into Crypto world. For that, I need some advice and appreciate your attention.

What is the most secure wallet that you can recommend me!?

I understand that physical is a better choice. I don’t mind if it is physical or a wallet app. I can spare an old phone and use it only for my wallet if a software approach is as good as the hardware one.

I am looking for some wallet that is open source. I understand that you can rely on open source much better. Please share your thoughts if that’s not the case.

For now I am only looking at keeping btc and eth so as long as those are covered I am good.

What other aspects shall I keep in mind picking a wallet? Longevity? Anything that you experienced please share. (For example I had a wallet and they have gone out of business, I had to go through hoops to retrieve my coins)

A wallet that give me options to stake eth. I am not looking for the best rate to stake but the most secure one. I understand that there is risk with staking, please share what staking risks you are ok with it and what you are not.

I understand that it might be a wish for all these to come true.

We all remember absolute moonshots with a new narrative that changed the game for a while. Projects like STEPN, than pumpfun, before that it was memecoins and stuff like that.

Right now all i see is basically some crypto scams that are so obvious it ridiculous people even spend time on creating them

so this got me thinking - am i missing something right now or there is straight up nothing right now ?
im not talking particular coins/projects, im talking about major growing narrative?

As the title says, is it?

Should someone who has 0 crypto assets in 2026 start investing in crpyto?

I've been planning to invest in crypto for many years but postponed it each time due to different reasons yet i've been always impressed by the "stability" for the last few years and the belief that some have in this field.

Yet, even though there are some strong opinions about investing in crpyto, there are many who believe that entering the crypto market nowadays won't "benefit" you as much as someone who joined many years ago or of course in comparing those who mined and those who joined at the beginning, those people usually recommend to invest in stocks as it is "safer" for the long run.

Even purchased the Safe3 to store the crypto there, still sealed in a box but I am not sure whether I should start putting even 200$ a month because I see how many people are losing their wallets, funds and deposits because many platforms suddenly freeze/lock the accounts because people wanted to pull out their funds, whether it was in general or to an external offline wallet.

* Important note

Several years ago when XRP was still around 0.5$ I think, bought 500$ worth of XRP and after a period of year or two I decided to pull the money out because of fomo and because I "needed" the money.
Took me a while to withdraw the money because Binance did not make that easy nor their documentation was clear about how to withdraw the money correctly.
Long story short several months later XRP jumped to 2.X$ and I could've multiply my then "investment" x5 if I only had the patience that I have today.

So, mid 2026, do you recommend anyone start investing in crypto for the long run in true belief that "it will hold"?

Do you believe in the investing platforms?

Tips?

In 2018 I invested in 1% of my net worth into Bitcoin and Ethereum. I'm up 462% on that initial investment, but for the past 5 years, there's been no growth.

The reason I invested was to speculate and make money. I don't care about the technology, just being honest.

Should I sell and find the next speculative investment in the stock market? My portfolio is the same price as in May 2021, so I'm struggling to see crypto continuing to grow, and also looking at the stock market and debating whether that's a better place for fun money.

Maybe I’m missing something but why is using BTC outside exchanges still so complicated?

I’ve held BTC for years but every time I look into actually using it onchain it feels like I need to learn an entirely different stack first.

Bitcoin wallets, wrapping, bridges, moving across chains, gas tokens etc.

Feels like the UX gap between “holding BTC” and “actually using BTC” is still massive for normal users.

Has anyone else felt this or am I overthinking it?

Hey. I need to talk to someone who is involved with the crypto reputation services industry.

I pissed someone off, I guess. I'm not going to tell a big story here. But now for some reason every token I ever made, or make, is tagged with a "serial rug pull" designation somewhere and so warning at efvery endpoint I can find.

I have a token with 19 locked pools tagged as a "serial rug pull".

Anyways it's obviously account-based, not a particular token. I went ahead and made another token after a few weeks and it's immediately tagged, even though deployed with a fresh address using a gas account.

Now, since I make pools of my tokens (and make tokens) for bots to trade - this is fucking up my hobby. And since they tagged my actual 'released' protocol it's fucking with my investors.

I'm not running around trying to doxx with every fool that has a 'scanner'; on a web page. These blind web forms are pissing me off. But trying to find out who this is or where it's at is a silly trail of incredibly frustrating helplessness. I've tried to reach out to blockaid and the people behind tokensniffer to no avail.

Does anyone here have meaningful knowledge in this area? I haven't done anything criminal or even scammy IMO but I'm not asking for judgement. I'm asking where the guts of this are at.

Last fresh deployer was funded with a gas account. I can start a new tree of adresses with careful segregation via CEX funding. But if it's via remix, debank, heaven forbid coinbase creating a linked list of addresses somewhere?

So the trouble is that this rating system has me starting to consider evasive and shady activities that I don't need or want. It's like they're making me into what they're accusing me of.

Anyone have useful knowledge here? I tried to use crosspost from r/defi but it wouldn't submit.

For tax purposes I won’t delete my account for a few more months but as a service it’s dead to me.

I needed 150 in Bitcoin today for a purchase so I signed in and proceeded to add money and send my buy order through.

Everything clears without incident and order is fulfilled in 30 or so seconds. Off I go and grab the receiving address and set that order up.

Suddenly I’m frozen from transactions. Can’t send any crypto out. Only live in the Coinbase universe.

It is now requiring identity verification with ID and video confirmation or it’s locked until the 16th of June!

Mind you, I had issues accessing my tax forms from their document section. I had to go through ID verification… I had to do my ID and video with pictures of my face…
This was about a week and a half to two weeks ago..

Now I’m required to do the ID and Face ID AGAIN… plus there is this run down of extremely intrusive questions regarding my intentions. My employment, my wealth, my friendships… other unnecessary private info which has a zero point zero chance of my honest answer … just because.

Instead of throwing my phone against the wall… I message off and explain to the waiting individual that payment will need to wait until i speak with help desk real quick and straighten this out.

When I explain my issue and how I had to do this verification twice this year and once last week and I’m quite positive we know the “me” that uses the account.

Hold for 15 minutes… followed multiple similar exchanges.

“Sorry, looks like you’ll be locked out for transfers until the date stated”

I lost it.

I Spouted off (sternly stated without raising my tone of voice) about how… “you’re crooked, ratchet ass thieves!”… You are perfectly comfortable with my identity verification so much so you accept money from my account but as soon as you get you’re profit side complete suddenly I am an unknown, unsafe entity needing protecting from myself apparently.

There was no possible escalation I was told. The date is the date. He refused to reply to my judgment of their timing to lock an account.

I hung up, went into Exodus and set up buying though them. Purchase made and sent out almost instantaneously.

F u k Coinbase

Thanks for making it this far. You care more than Coinbase and I don’t spend thousands on you.

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.

Rules:

• All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
• Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
• Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
• Comments will be sorted by newest first.

Useful Links:

• Beginner Resources
• Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs ????
• MOONs Wiki Page
• r/CryptoCurrency Discord
• r/CryptoCurrencyMemes
• Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.)
• r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance.

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

• u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads.

My searches end up with having to give up cc info only to find out the platform or free trial doesn’t do what I need. I am willing to pay for it but the hunt has become exhausting.

Looking for real-time alerts on wide variety of coins for EMAs, BBand crosses, RSI, VWAP primarily.

Mandatory: Realtime and wide variety of coins (not a stock broker that added major coins only).

Thanks for any input.

Polymarket got hit again. May 22nd, someone drained around $660K in USDC and POL through their UMA CTF Adapter on Polygon. ZachXBT caught it first. The guy was pulling 5,000 POL every 30 seconds lol.

Polymarket said "no contracts were exploited, all user funds are safe." Turns out it was a compromised private key from their rewards payout system. So not a smart contract bug, just someone got the keys. I mean that's still not great?

What gets me is this is like their third incident in 6mons. And every single time the answer is "core protocol is fine." The core protocol is fine, everything around it keeps getting popped though. POL dumped on the news too, funding rate on bydfi flipped negative pretty fast.

Oh and the audit they did back in 2021? Didn't even cover the part that got exploited. So...how many "isolated incidents" before it's a pattern?

I saw kraken has released the vault for btc for 2.5% apy.

Would you do this? I know staking normally with btc on kraken is not worth it.

Unpopular opinion: most of crypto is not meaningfully decentralized anymore. It’s just traditional finance cosplay with worse customer service and better memes.

Everyone says they hate banks, but then they trust:

centralized exchanges to hold their coins
stablecoin issuers to not freeze them
VC-backed chains to “govern” fairly
bridges that get hacked every six months
influencers who dump while preaching conviction
foundations that quietly decide what “the community” wants

At some point, we have to admit a lot of this industry didn’t replace the old system. It rebuilt the same power structure, added tokens, and called it freedom.

Bitcoin still has a clean argument: scarce, simple, hard to change, no CEO.

But 90% of crypto? It’s basically startup equity without shareholder rights, financial products without investor protection, and casinos without free drinks.

I’m not saying crypto is dead. I’m saying the industry needs to stop pretending every token launch is a revolution.

Most of it is marketing. Most communities are exit liquidity. Most roadmaps are delayed promises. And most “decentralized” projects still depend on a small group of insiders, devs, whales, exchanges, or foundations.

The uncomfortable question is this:

If your project can be killed by regulators, insiders, AWS, a foundation wallet, a stablecoin freeze, or one founder disappearing…

was it ever really decentralized?

Genuine question not trying to sell anything, just had a rabbit hole moment today.

Read about a family who inherited their dad's estate. Grant of probate. Death certificate. Everything legal.

They found his Ledger in a drawer.

Nobody knew the PIN. Nobody knew the recovery phrase. Nobody knew which exchanges he used.

Legally theirs. Practically gone forever.

This got me thinking how many people actually have a plan for this?

From what I can tell, the problem is bigger than just crypto:

• Hardware wallets need PINs and seed phrases
• Exchange accounts need 2FA that dies with your phone
• Even email accounts that everything else is tied to become inaccessible
• HMRC (UK) treats crypto as property for inheritance tax so your estate owes tax on assets they can't even access

Some numbers floating around:

• $68B estimated inaccessible due to lost keys (Chainalysis)
• 89% of holders have no inheritance plan

Has anyone here actually dealt with this as an executor? Did exchanges cooperate? Were you able to recover hardware wallet funds?

And genuinely do you have any kind of plan set up for your own holdings? Curious what people actually do in practice.

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.

Rules:

• All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
• Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
• Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
• Comments will be sorted by newest first.

Useful Links:

• Beginner Resources
• Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs ????
• MOONs Wiki Page
• r/CryptoCurrency Discord
• r/CryptoCurrencyMemes
• Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.)
• r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance.

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

• u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads.

Seriously, what is going on here? just got a notification that NASDAQ hit an ATH.

Yet here we are with crypto floundering?

If this is not an indicator that stocks, particularly tech stocks, are not interrelated with crypto then I don't know what is.

Stockmarket (Tech) does not = Crypto!!!

WTAF is going on here?

While everyone's been staring at BTC price action and ETF outflows, Vitalik dropped an actual technical roadmap for making. Ethereum quantum-resistant. I've read through it and the implications go way beyond ETH.

Here's what's being proposed:

BLS signatures replacing ECDSA as the primary scheme. This is the big one, ECDSA is vulnerable to quantum attacks and BLS isn't.

KZG commitments getting a security review against quantum threat models. These are what power the current proto-danksharding setup.

Staking and validator key rotation being restructured to survive a theoretical quantum break without requiring a hard fork at gunpoint.

Why this matters for the whole space and not just ETH holders: if Ethereum actually executes this roadmap, it becomes the first major smart contract platform with a credible quantum defense plan. That matters because quantum computing timelines keep getting shorter. IBM's roadmap has them at 100,000+ qubits by 2033. Google's Willow chip already demonstrated error correction.

Now, whether that's real enough to threaten ECDSA-based chains is debated. But the market tends to price these things once they move from "theoretical risk" to "named technical response." Vitalik publishing an actual roadmap with specific cryptographic targets is that transition.

The other thing happening simultaneously: the ETH Foundation is restructuring into what Vitalik called a "smaller ship." Less overhead, more focused on protocol resilience and privacy. If you squint, these two moves together look like ETH preparing for a world where the competition isn't other L1s, it's external disruption.

BTC doesn't have a quantum roadmap. Most L1s don't. If quantum resistance becomes a narrative in the next cycle (and I think it will once quantum computing hits mainstream tech coverage), the chains that have actual plans in place will get the premium.

This isn't financial advice and I'm not saying go buy ETH. I'm saying the technical infrastructure discussion is shifting in ways that aren't showing up in price yet.

At the moment have some positions in stocks and ETFs but I want to put 20% of my capital in Crypto as I believe it’s going to be important in the future. I was thinking about DCAing into BTC and ETH or buying when the crypto fear and greed index reaches extreme fear. I was wondering if maybe there are some key price levels to buy at?

In summary, I am a beginner to crypto and want to invest in the long term, how should I do it and what should I invest into?

I’ve made money from crypto before, specifically from Solana, but the rest, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Fantom, XRP, and Shiba (throws up in mouth) have all made me lose money. And I genuinely held for YEARS. I had the mindset of, “If I don’t sell it then it won’t be at a loss, if I wait long enough then it will go back up.” So I held for years. I was a good boy with diamond hands instead of wet paper bag hands. Until I saw a comment that really opened my eyes. It said, “So your strategy is to buy high and never sell?”

A month ago, before selling my crypto, I decided to try my hand at buying stocks in a brokerage account. Specifically Ai stocks, like Micron and SanDisk. SanDisk is now up 72% for me and Micron is up 54% with gains of 16% today. I could only watch my stock investments go up, and crypto go down more so much before I decided to sell the crypto. At first I was like, “I’ll just wait until my crypto breaks even, then I’ll sell it and put it into stocks.” Then I realized . . . Why am I waiting for crypto to go back up while I’m literally watching my stock investments go up in front of my eye?

Anywho, figured I’d share my experience, and while this is not financial advice, I hope it will help some of you guys make money. Best of luck friends.

I lost everything trading futures. Feeling at my lowest. I need some motivation to recover and start new. Please post your crypto liquidations. How did it feel when you got email from Binance/coinbase? Did you get liquidated in Binance 10/11? How did you bounce back? Please give some motivation.

The upcoming OpenAI IPO! Since Altman owns this project as well, it’s serving as a proxy.

Enjoy! ????????????

Certain crypto whales are in a peculiar position. They hold wealth that is, by every technical measure, more auditable than any traditional asset: every transaction, every wallet, every transfer sits on a public ledger any compliance officer can read. Yet banks sometimes treat incoming fiat from a crypto exchange as radioactive.

The actual friction point for crypto whales banking isn't account opening. The issue is Source of Wealth and Source of Funds, the moment compliance asks how the money was made and where your money came from. That's what the compliance department at the bank is built to verify: clean funds, no laundering risk.

Typical profiles affected:

• Early miners (solo and pool) with missing intermediary wallets or original receiving wallets
• BTC bought pre-2015 on exchanges that no longer exist (BTC-e, Cryptopia, Mt. Gox, etc)
• Algo/high frequency traders with thousands/millions of executions across exchanges and on-chain
• DeFi users with activity across chains, bridges, LPs, farms
• ETH ICO and token sale participants
• LocalBitcoins and other P2P buyers
• Privacy-coin holders with limited on-chain visibility
• People paid in BTC for services or businesses years ago
• People with "tainted" funds because they interacted with "high risk" counterparties

For traditional wealth, profiles give documents compliance has processed for decades: payslips, business sale agreements, inheritance docs, property transactions, audited accounts.

The issue with crypto is that compliance is not used to dealing with type of source of funds/wealth, and they are usually not trained/comfortable to understand it or have the tools be able to validate it.

The irony is that most of what compliance actually needs already exists. On-chain history is complete and public. Active exchange accounts retain trade history, deposit and withdrawal logs, and fiat funding records. Operational mining pools still hold payout histories; solo miners have block rewards visible directly on chain. Transaction history, address provenance, timestamps are all verifiable on demand.

The real gaps are narrow: dead exchanges (trading data unavailable), wallets abandoned a decade ago, undocumented P2P trades. These usually need "risk mitigation" to be accepted.

A bit of unsolicited advice for anyone in this position: talk to the bank before cashing out, not after. Ask explicitly what they need for Source of Wealth and Source of Funds. Requirements vary bank to bank and some won't accept crypto-origin funds at all, regardless of documentation. Better to find that out before the wire moves than after.

Over the past few years plenty of banks have become more crypto-friendly. But this is still a real obstacle for holders worldwide. When does the rest of the industry catch up?

I’d tell myself not to chase every coin people are hyping on Twitter. Also, learn wallet security early. I spent too much time looking for the “next 100x” and not enough time understanding seed phrases, approvals, and fake links.

I have these thoughts on crypto regulation for anti-money laundering and tax purposes.
I know little of the current political space. Just speculation.

1. Anonymity of small transactions could become less private.

Government mandate reporting of personal addresses for tax paying purposes.
Exchanges reports trades and outflows to nominated addresses.
If a government says transactions for personal use under a limit, such as 10k, are tax-free.
Your only purpose for wanting an anonymous wallet is to circumvent tax on purchases over 10K, except most assets at this size require POI/KYC OR for small transaction privacy conerns i will talk about further down.
Government will require business wallet addresses to be reported.
They can then link all Citizens with small spending habits.

If you purchase from a marketing company (Fb, Google etc), or one that sells data to a data broker, if the marketing company/broker then collects a list of business addresses, they can see your spending habits (not individual items, just cost at a shop).
This also means these companies can identify big fish (large investors, founders, insiders) and track their trades, or spending habits for geo-tracking and corporate espionage (im sure the potential exists).

2. Wallet address + Identity Association - Security and CBDC Roles

If these marketing companies/broker, government, or any company that registers your identity with wallet address is hacked.
You are open to hacking (social engineering/phishing emails/sim swap 2FA/kidnapping/blackmail/Scams).
A bank would normally protect/manage compromised accounts.
Now it's up to you.
If a service like haveibeenpwned.com existed for these exposed links (identity+wallet) you would need to transfer funds to a new wallet, but it would be on the ledger.
So you would rely on a tumbler, monero, or what i believe will happen.

A CBDC funds exchange service. You send them your funds from a compromised account, using them like a VPN privacy layer (as their ledger is private), then they send funds to nominated new wallet address.

3. Integration of these concerns and BAN lists

If private and business wallets are recorded by government, they may choose to use BAN address lists. To prevent tax avoidance and crime.
They may even say "If its not registered it is banned, until it is registered".
In this senario it would make BTC/ALTS banned from direct purchasing of goods and services unless there was a new protocol layer to cross-reference with updated BAN lists.

More likely they will require BTC conversion via lightning to CBDC smart contract at the terminal to accept or deny based on registering status of the wallet address.
Meaning the bank will still see your every small transaction, and will likely take a fee as well.

It'd be difficult to implement this for just 1 country as travellers would be restricted to traditional currency systems. Unless.
It works into the current SWIFT network of participating banks in many countries.
So again the banks see all, the government controls functionality of funds:
You own it in cold wallets, but they restrict where you can use it.

4. Banks, CBDC and loans

Banks need peoples money in storage - so they can create loans with fractional reserve lending.
If they have less in the bank, less loans, so naturally they will subsidise some of this loss by becoming a payment processor.
Maybe Crypto Staking pools will be allowed with 3rd parties, or even banks!
But IMO the government like small number of big entities for 'easier' regulation.
There is worry of how smaller businesses might manage risk profiles A+, A, B etc... lumping of credit loans (GFC crash).
This may be a way they can recuperate bank balances for loan creation from staking.
Or time-release smart contracts so you can still withdraw funds slowly during a crisis instead of a pure bank hold, so you own the funds in a private key, its access is blocked for a certain time after request which allows banks some time and less risk to offer loans with their fractional reserve requirements.

TLDR;

How this may look.
You store in cold wallets.
So banks cannot with-hold withdrawals in a time of crisis or market upheaval.
But the government now can BAN you based on changing aggressiveness and thresholds for applying BAN lists to prevent circumventing tax, money-laundering and crime proceeds.
They can also see your spending habits at retailers which they were not privvy to previously unless they Audited you.

Hackers and Marketing Companies know even more about you.
Marketing companies that associate identity to personal wallet addresses can compare to Business Address registers, and now also have personal spending habit data, can identify big fish for insider trading and corporate espionage.

If government force a BTC to CBDC conversion at payment terminals to compare to the BAN lists, banks will then see all spending data, again, and likely charge as a payment processor due to less people holding CBDC/Fiat in their Bank accounts (if in cold wallet opposed to multi-crypto friendly banking wallets).
Loaning systems with the banks is disrupted which will affect economies if 3rd party solutions are created and regulated.
Any compromise of your account requires a CBDC privacy fund transfer service to a new wallet, or tumbler or monero.
Banks if multi-cryto friendly would be able to control your funds.
Unless they designed a delay-released of funds protocols for parking crypto assets in you bank account, which reduces bank risk profile to use that capital to create loans. While maintaining some ability to hold ownership based on a smart contract without them halting it until they feel like it.

Thoughts?

Hey everyone,

I’ve been spending the last few months diving deep into the structural intersection of LLMs, automated order book mechanics, and decentralized networks. I think we need to look past surface-level AI wrappers, speculative trading bots, and basic web-scraping scripts if we are to come to the truth about where we are in the timeline here. We are standing on the edge of a massive structural shift: the absolute economic convergence of Agentic AI & Financial Markets using crypto as the its main economic force.

Here is a comprehensive breakdown of how this machine-to-machine (M2M) ecosystem is being built, the protocols driving it, and how it will fundamentally transform algorithmic trading forever.

1. The Bottleneck: Economic Containment

We are quickly moving past chat interfaces into the era of Agentic AI, autonomous software entities capable of multi-step reasoning, independent planning, and long-term task execution. However, as these systems enter the real world, they face a critical problem: fiat financial systems cannot handle them.

An autonomous AI agent cannot open a traditional bank account, pass standard corporate KYC (Know Your Customer) checks, or hold a standard corporate credit card without introducing massive operational and security risks. Giving an uncontained software script access to a corporate bank API creates a risk of unbounded financial loss if the model experiences a logic loop hallucination or compromises its API key. Furthermore, traditional credit cards charge flat baseline fees (e.g., $0.30 + 2.9%), rendering micro-cents or per-token streaming payments mathematically impossible.

The solution? Crypto rails. Decentralized networks provide the native, trustless, and programmable payment architecture that treats software agents as first-class economic actors.

2. The Multi-Chain Machine Stack

An agent economy cannot exist on a single blockchain because no single architecture excels at everything. Instead, we are seeing the emergence of a highly integrated, specialized multi-chain hardware and software stack

The Layer Breakdown:

• Intelligence Production: Bittensor (TAO) commoditizes machine learning capabilities through continuous cryptographic competition across specialized subnets. Agents tap into Bittensor as a decentralized, censorship-resistant API brain.
• The Execution Engines: Internet Computer Protocol (ICP) allows large language models and agent business logic to run completely on-chain inside Canister smart contracts, removing external cloud dependencies. Meanwhile, there is NEAR Protocol, which uses Chain Abstraction to handle background routing and multi-chain signing across Ethereum, Solana, and Bitcoin smoothly.
• Privacy & Key Isolation: Phala Network (PHA) and platforms like Venice AI (VVV) leverage Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) (hardware enclaves like Intel TDX and NVIDIA Confidential Computing). This ensures an agent's internal reasoning weights, private keys, and data inputs are completely encrypted and invisible to the physical server host.
• The Identity & Payment Foundations: Kite AI (KITE) uses its SPACE framework and Agent Passport system to establish secure machine identities via BIP-32 hierarchical derivation, cleanly separating human root ownership from delegated spending constraints (e.g., hard-capping an agent's wallet to a maximum spend of $5/hour). The raw computing silicon powering this infrastructure is leased permissionlessly from open GPU marketplaces like Akash Network (AKT).
• Coordination & Asset Co-ownership: Autonolas (OLAS) coordinates complex agent clusters off-chain while maintaining verifiable states on-chain, while Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL) allows consumer-facing agents to establish autonomous digital brands with fractionalized co-ownership tokens.

3. The Metamorphosis of Algorithmic Trading

This convergence shifts algorithmic trading from static, hardcoded quantitative models to dynamic, context-aware reasoning engines.

Legacy quant models are highly efficient at time-series calculations, but they are completely blind to contextual shifts. A TEE-secured agentic trading setup continually ingests multi-source unstructured data, such as social sentiment, breaking macroeconomic headlines, on-chain wallet tracking, and liquidity pool imbalances.

Instead of waiting for a rigid mathematical cross, the agent uses internal chain-of-thought logic to evaluate structural chart mechanics like Inner Circle Trader (ICT) Market Maker Models (MMXM) or multi-timeframe Fair Value Gaps (FVG) with human-like contextual understanding, executing complex multi-step capital hedges at machine-scale speeds.

4. The Structural Tradeoffs & Vulnerabilities

To keep this objective, this paradigm shift isn't without significant friction points:

1. Systemic LLM Hallucinations: A hallucination in a customer support chatbot results in a minor PR issue; a logical hallucination in a financial execution agent can result in instantaneous capital destruction. This requires immutable Boundary Smart Contracts that block any agent transaction violating predefined risk profiles.
2. Hardware Enclave Exploits: The entire premise of private machine wallets relies on the security of physical TEE components. Any zero-day vulnerability breaking hardware enclaves risks exposing the private keys of millions of autonomous systems simultaneously.
3. The Regulatory Horizon: Global frameworks are built entirely on human liability. If an autonomous agent operating on a decentralized network triggers a localized market flash crash, assigning legal accountability introduces a massive legal grey area between developers, validators, and compute providers.

Curious to hear your thoughts. How are you positioning your development stacks or capital for this transition? Are you leaning toward on-chain native runtimes like ICP or off-chain TEE execution clusters like Phala?

Let's discuss it fam