Orange-pilling efforts should be directed toward the curious

Most attempts to orange-pill people fail because Bitcoiners explain before the other person is actually curious.

If someone has not asked a real question, a long explanation usually feels like pressure, even if the argument is good. The better approach is to first understand what they already think Bitcoin is: scam, speculation, digital gold, political tool, or something else. That tells you where the conversation should begin. The point is not to make someone buy after one discussion, but to make them curious enough to study it on their own.

What do you find most important when orange-pilling?