My algo has a 1.70 Sharpe after 84 days live — but 0 copiers. Sharing the full equity curve so someone can tell me what I'm doing wrong

I've been quietly operating a spot algo on Binance since early March — actual money, no paper buying and selling — and after 84 days I'm making an attempt to know why I have zero copiers regardless of metrics that I assumed would stand out. Posting the complete screenshot because I genuinely need suggestions, not validation.

The strategy is a dynamic ATR grid with a circuit breaker that mechanically halts new purchase orders throughout sharp drops to protect capital. Hosted on AWS Tokyo for latency causes.

90-day stay results:
– ROI: +16.39% (PnL: +$84.83)
– Sharpe Ratio: 1.70
– Max Drawdown: 13.11%
– Win Fee: 79.52% — 66 of 84 days green

The factor I find most fascinating in that equity curve is the March–April interval. You possibly can see the drawdown line spike when the market dropped, then the bot paused buys, and it recovered to new highs by late Might with none guide intervention. The circuit breaker did exactly what it was designed to do.

For context: a Sharpe of 1.zero is extensively thought-about "good" for an lively technique. Most retail algo merchants I see posting listed here are proud of zero.7–0.9 on backtests. This is 1.70 on a reside account with real slippage and costs.

And but — Binance's copy trading algorithm buries me because my lead stability is ~$618. Traders with $50okay–$100okay and visibly worse drawdowns are featured above me.

Two things I'm genuinely not sure about:
1. Is there a method to make risk-adjusted metrics extra visible to potential copiers on platforms like this, or is it purely a capital signaling recreation?
2. Taking a look at my fairness curve — is there anything that may make you personally hesitant to repeat this, that I'm not seeing from the within?

Recognize trustworthy takes.