One of the challenges of decentralization is keeping the size of the blockchain small so that nodes are not too expensive to run. This is why we donβt just keep increasing the block size.
Eth 2.0 is supposed to increase the scale of ethereum by using a different consensus mechanism, which allows blocks to be added much more quickly, but how does the network not suffer from having a blockchain that explodes in size, requiring nodes to use more storage, and thus causing node centralization? How is moving to proof of stake any different from just increasing the block size in that respect?
[link] [comments]
You can get bonuses upto $100 FREE BONUS when you:
π° Install these recommended apps:
π² SocialGood - 100% Crypto Back on Everyday Shopping
π² xPortal - The DeFi For The Next Billion
π² CryptoTab Browser - Lightweight, fast, and ready to mine!
π° Register on these recommended exchanges:
π‘ Binanceπ‘ Bitfinexπ‘ Bitmartπ‘ Bittrexπ‘ Bitget
π‘ CoinExπ‘ Crypto.comπ‘ Gate.ioπ‘ Huobiπ‘ Kucoin.
Comments