I was always convinced that the energy use of the current system dwarfs that of BTC when talking in terms of life cycle, as you need to:
- source the material
- print the cash
- safely transport it
- safely store it
- etc.
All these are energy intensive.. until I was told that nowadays that's not how it works. Money are printed digitally only with the click of a mouse. The physical amount is a tiny percentage of that. On the other hand, 'extending the BTC network to cover the same market cap would require a massive amount of computational power.'
What do you think?
[link] [comments]

You can get bonuses upto $100 FREE BONUS when you:
💰 Install these recommended apps:
💲 SocialGood - 100% Crypto Back on Everyday Shopping
💲 xPortal - The DeFi For The Next Billion
💲 CryptoTab Browser - Lightweight, fast, and ready to mine!
💰 Register on these recommended exchanges:
🟡 Binance🟡 Bitfinex🟡 Bitmart🟡 Bittrex🟡 Bitget
🟡 CoinEx🟡 Crypto.com🟡 Gate.io🟡 Huobi🟡 Kucoin.
Comments