We're an indie game studio that has a small number of NFTs minted and sold on Ethereum, you might remember this post from a while back. Our NFTs give the player a one of a kind skin in-game as well as other premium perks. I'm a big fan of Ethereum and long-time supporter, but trying to make the best decision here for our players.
Since our NFTs are more than a PFP project, the obvious pain point is that any activity has become very expensive (gas). An in-game NFT economy on Solana is a lot more feasible because transaction fees are so small and super fast. We'd also be able to mint more lower-value game items as well instead of only being able to exclusively cater to "the rich" that can afford expensive NFTs and gas fees.
The goal would be to not have to support both chains so I would imagine it to be a one-way bridge (ETH tokens probably would get burnt). The tokens that aren't bridged would still be tradable on Ethereum, but the in-game benefits may eventually be lost if we discontinue support for ETH. If we eventually drop bridge support, the unbridged tokens would just not be available on Solana (essentially considered burnt).
We believe the lower fees would be a game changer opening up a lot more possibilities, utility, and user freedom. Would love to get your objective feedback and thoughts on why this would be a good or bad idea, or any alternative solutions that might be out there.
[link] [comments]
You can get bonuses upto $100 FREE BONUS when you:
π° Install these recommended apps:
π² SocialGood - 100% Crypto Back on Everyday Shopping
π² xPortal - The DeFi For The Next Billion
π² CryptoTab Browser - Lightweight, fast, and ready to mine!
π° Register on these recommended exchanges:
π‘ Binanceπ‘ Bitfinexπ‘ Bitmartπ‘ Bittrexπ‘ Bitget
π‘ CoinExπ‘ Crypto.comπ‘ Gate.ioπ‘ Huobiπ‘ Kucoin.
Comments